lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] afs: Stop implementing ->writepage()
Date
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> > (1) afs_write_back_from_locked_folio() could be called directly rather
> > than calling filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), but that would avoid the
> > control group stuff that wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode() and co. seem to
> > do. Do I actually need to do this?
>
> That would be much preferred over the for_write_begin hack, given that
> write_begin really isn't a well defined method but a hacky hook for
> legacy write implementations.

So I don't need to worry about the control group stuff? I'll still need some
way to flush a conflicting write whatever mechanism is being used to write to
the page cache.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-21 09:31    [W:0.038 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site