Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:50:11 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] module: Merge same-name module load requests | From | David Hildenbrand <> |
| |
On 21.11.22 20:03, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:00:49PM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote: >> On 11/16/22 17:03, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >>> On 11/15/22 14:29, Luis Chamberlain wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:45:05PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>> Note that I don't think the issue I raised is due to 6e6de3dee51a. >>>>> I don't have the machine at hand right now. But, again, I doubt this will >>>>> fix it. >>>> >>>> There are *more* modules processed after that commit. That's all. So >>>> testing would be appreciated. >>>> >>> >>> Can anyone tell us if >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20221102195957.82871-1-stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com/ >>> >>> resolves the module loading delay problem? >> >> This patch unfortunately makes no difference on my test system. In my case, >> the kernel has already intel_pstate loaded when udev starts inserting a burst >> of acpi_cpufreq modules. It then causes the init function acpi_cpufreq_init() >> to immediately return once the check cpufreq_get_current_driver() fails. The >> code modified by the patch is not reached at all. > > To be clear I don't care about the patch mentioned in the above URL, I care > about this: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d0bc50e3-0e42-311b-20ed-7538bb918c5b@suse.com > > David was this the on you tested too?
Yes, that's the one I tried without luck.
-- Thanks,
David / dhildenb
| |