lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/4] iommu/mediatek: Adjust mtk_iommu_config flow
Date
On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 14:42 +0800, Chengci.Xu wrote:
> For reduce indention without functional change, prepare for MT8188.
> If there are many port in a same larb, current flow will update
> larb_mmu->mmu or update INFRA register for too many times.
> So we save all port to portid_msk in the front of mtk_iommu_config(),
> and then update only once for IOMMU configure. By this modification,
> we can prevent MT8188 from sending to many SMC calls, avoiding enter
> ATF for each port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengci.Xu <chengci.xu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> --
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 5a4e00e4bbbc..fbaf401f34e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -534,41 +534,49 @@ static int mtk_iommu_config(struct
> mtk_iommu_data *data, struct device *dev,
> unsigned int larbid, portid;
> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> const struct mtk_iommu_iova_region *region;
> - u32 peri_mmuen, peri_mmuen_msk;
> + unsigned long portid_msk_ext;
> + u32 portid_msk = 0;
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; ++i) {
> - larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[i]);
> portid = MTK_M4U_TO_PORT(fwspec->ids[i]);
> + portid_msk |= BIT(portid);
> + }
>
> - if (MTK_IOMMU_IS_TYPE(data->plat_data,
> MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM)) {
> - larb_mmu = &data->larb_imu[larbid];
> + if (MTK_IOMMU_IS_TYPE(data->plat_data, MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_MM)) {
> + /* All ports should be in the same larb. just use 0
> here */
> + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);
> + larb_mmu = &data->larb_imu[larbid];
> + region = data->plat_data->iova_region + regionid;
>
> - region = data->plat_data->iova_region +
> regionid;
> + portid_msk_ext = portid_msk;
> + for_each_set_bit(portid, &portid_msk_ext, 32)

Why do we need define a new portid_msk_ext? Can't we use portid_msk
directly?

> larb_mmu->bank[portid] = upper_32_bits(region-
> >iova_base);
>
> - dev_dbg(dev, "%s iommu for larb(%s) port %d
> region %d rgn-bank %d.\n",
> - enable ? "enable" : "disable",
> dev_name(larb_mmu->dev),
> - portid, regionid, larb_mmu-
> >bank[portid]);
> -
> - if (enable)
> - larb_mmu->mmu |=
> MTK_SMI_MMU_EN(portid);
> - else
> - larb_mmu->mmu &=
> ~MTK_SMI_MMU_EN(portid);
> - } else if (MTK_IOMMU_IS_TYPE(data->plat_data,
> MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_INFRA)) {
> - peri_mmuen_msk = BIT(portid);
> - /* PCI dev has only one output id, enable the
> next writing bit for PCIe */
> - if (dev_is_pci(dev))
> - peri_mmuen_msk |= BIT(portid + 1);
> -
> - peri_mmuen = enable ? peri_mmuen_msk : 0;
> - ret = regmap_update_bits(data->pericfg,
> PERICFG_IOMMU_1,
> - peri_mmuen_msk,
> peri_mmuen);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_err(dev, "%s iommu(%s) inframaster
> 0x%x fail(%d).\n",
> - enable ? "enable" : "disable",
> - dev_name(data->dev),
> peri_mmuen_msk, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s iommu for larb(%s) port 0x%x region %d
> rgn-bank %d.\n",
> + enable ? "enable" : "disable",
> dev_name(larb_mmu->dev),
> + portid_msk, regionid, upper_32_bits(region-
> >iova_base));
> +
> + if (enable)
> + larb_mmu->mmu |= portid_msk;
> + else
> + larb_mmu->mmu &= ~portid_msk;
> + } else if (MTK_IOMMU_IS_TYPE(data->plat_data,
> MTK_IOMMU_TYPE_INFRA)) {
> + /* PCI dev has only one output id, enable the next
> writing bit for PCIe */
> + if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> + if (fwspec->num_ids != 1) {
> + dev_err(dev, "PCI dev can only have one
> port.\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + portid_msk |= BIT(portid + 1);
> }
> +
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(data->pericfg,
> PERICFG_IOMMU_1,
> + portid_msk, enable ?
> portid_msk : 0);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(dev, "%s iommu(%s) inframaster 0x%x
> fail(%d).\n",
> + enable ? "enable" : "disable",
> + dev_name(data->dev), portid_msk, ret);
> }
> return ret;
> }
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-21 06:19    [W:0.074 / U:1.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site