lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Describe kernel version prefix for third option
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:19:44AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 11/1/22 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > No, sorry, this is not needed and does not have to be in the subject
> > line at all.
> >
> > The current wording is fine, it's just that people don't always read it.
> >
> > so consider this a NAK.
> >
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> There was a case when a submitter submitted multiple backports (which
> qualified for third option) without specifying the prefix, hence a
> reviewer complained [1].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221101074351.GA8310@amd/

Yes, and as I said on that thread, to you directly:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y2Ef0hK4rTmAoEUs@kroah.com/
the submission was done correctly, no one should have complained, and
the patches were applied by me to the correct branches without any
problems at all.

This is not an issue, this change is not needed at all.

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-02 05:58    [W:0.044 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site