lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] clk: qcom: gcc-sc8280xp: add cxo as parent for gcc_ufs_ref_clkref_clk
From


On 11/2/2022 12:46 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Shazad Hussain (2022-10-30 07:23:33)
>>> Since 'commit f3aa975e230e ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: correct ref
>>
>> So we should have a Fixes tag for this commit? Or really back to the
>> beginning of the driver?
>>
>>> clock for ufs_mem_phy")' we need to explicitly make cxo as parent to
>>> gcc_ufs_ref_clkref_clk to have an independent vote from ufs_mem_phy.
>
> The commit message is slightly misleading as this affects the other UFS
> PHY as well.
>
> If CX is indeed a parent of this clock then the issue has been there
> since the clock driver was added. (And otherwise, the PHY binding may
> need to be amended instead.)
>
> Johan

CX is not the actual parent of this clk. GCC_UFS_REF_CLKREF_CLK is an
external clk to the device, which needs to be voted. If we use the
GCC_UFS_REF_CLKREF_CLK as ref clk, we don't have explicit vote for CX
from ufs_mem_phy.
If no client votes for CX,(very unlikely) then it's won't be ON for
ufs_mem_phy as well right ! So to maintain the voting to CX, we make
this as parent to ref clk.

Shazad

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-02 08:59    [W:0.049 / U:1.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site