lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/3] hwmon: (max6639) Change from pdata to dt configuration
Hello,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 01:20:05PM +0100, Naresh Solanki wrote:
> max6639_platform_data is not used by any in-kernel driver and does not
> address the MAX6639 fans separately.
> Move to device tree configuration with explicit properties to configure
> each fan.

My overall impression is that this patch mixes too much things. IMHO it
should be split in (at least)

- Add dt support
- Drop platform support
- Add PWM provider support
- Make use of the PWM API

maybe also add the 2nd PWM in a separate step.

Some more comments inline.

> Non-DT platform can still use this module with its default
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@sylv.io>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/hwmon/max6639.c | 465 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 392 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index 5695b266abcf..ad1f6742ca50 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -1106,6 +1106,7 @@ config SENSORS_MAX6621
> config SENSORS_MAX6639
> tristate "Maxim MAX6639 sensor chip"
> depends on I2C
> + depends on PWM
> help
> If you say yes here you get support for the MAX6639
> sensor chips.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/max6639.c b/drivers/hwmon/max6639.c
> index 9b895402c80d..d1ae77e8f72e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/max6639.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/max6639.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> -#include <linux/platform_data/max6639.h>

This file is now unused and can be dropped.

> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
>
> /* Addresses to scan */
> static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = { 0x2c, 0x2e, 0x2f, I2C_CLIENT_END };
> @@ -54,11 +54,20 @@ static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = { 0x2c, 0x2e, 0x2f, I2C_CLIENT_END };
> #define MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI 0x08
>
> #define MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG1_PWM 0x80
> -
> +#define MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a_PWM_POL 0x02
> #define MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG3_THERM_FULL_SPEED 0x40
> +#define MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG3_FREQ_MASK 0x03
> +#define MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY_SLOT 120
>
> +/* Tach supported range. This internally controls tach frequency */
> static const int rpm_ranges[] = { 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000 };
>
> +/* Supported PWM frequency */
> +static const unsigned int freq_table[] = { 20, 33, 50, 100, 5000, 8333, 12500,
> + 25000 };

I would have put these in a single line, or one line per freq, or at
least aligned the last value such that it is at a higher column than the
opening {.

> +
> +
> +

Three empty lines? One or two only should do it.

> #define FAN_FROM_REG(val, rpm_range) ((val) == 0 || (val) == 255 ? \
> 0 : (rpm_ranges[rpm_range] * 30) / (val))
> #define TEMP_LIMIT_TO_REG(val) clamp_val((val) / 1000, 0, 255)
> @@ -76,20 +85,24 @@ struct max6639_data {
> u16 temp[2]; /* Temperature, in 1/8 C, 0..255 C */
> bool temp_fault[2]; /* Detected temperature diode failure */
> u8 fan[2]; /* Register value: TACH count for fans >=30 */
> + struct pwm_device *pwmd[2]; /* max6639 has two pwm device */
> + u32 target_rpm[2];
> + u32 max_rpm[2];
> +
> u8 status; /* Detected channel alarms and fan failures */
>
> /* Register values only written to */
> - u8 pwm[2]; /* Register value: Duty cycle 0..120 */
> u8 temp_therm[2]; /* THERM Temperature, 0..255 C (->_max) */
> u8 temp_alert[2]; /* ALERT Temperature, 0..255 C (->_crit) */
> u8 temp_ot[2]; /* OT Temperature, 0..255 C (->_emergency) */
>
> /* Register values initialized only once */
> - u8 ppr; /* Pulses per rotation 0..3 for 1..4 ppr */
> - u8 rpm_range; /* Index in above rpm_ranges table */
> -
> + u8 ppr[2]; /* Pulses per rotation 0..3 for 1..4 ppr */
> + u8 rpm_range[2]; /* Index in above rpm_ranges table */
> /* Optional regulator for FAN supply */
> struct regulator *reg;
> + /* max6639 pwm chip */
> + struct pwm_chip chip;
> };
>
> static struct max6639_data *max6639_update_device(struct device *dev)
> @@ -280,8 +293,12 @@ static ssize_t pwm_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *dev_attr,
> {
> struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(dev_attr);
> struct max6639_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct pwm_state state;
> +
> + pwm_get_state(data->pwmd[attr->index], &state);
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(&state, 255));
>
> - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", data->pwm[attr->index] * 255 / 120);
> }
>
> static ssize_t pwm_store(struct device *dev,
> @@ -290,9 +307,9 @@ static ssize_t pwm_store(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(dev_attr);
> struct max6639_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> unsigned long val;
> int res;
> + struct pwm_state state;
>
> res = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
> if (res)
> @@ -300,12 +317,12 @@ static ssize_t pwm_store(struct device *dev,
>
> val = clamp_val(val, 0, 255);
>
> - mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> - data->pwm[attr->index] = (u8)(val * 120 / 255);
> - i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY(attr->index),
> - data->pwm[attr->index]);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> + pwm_get_state(data->pwmd[attr->index], &state);
> + pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, val, 255);
> + res = pwm_apply_state(data->pwmd[attr->index], &state);
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> return count;
> }
>
> @@ -319,7 +336,7 @@ static ssize_t fan_input_show(struct device *dev,
> return PTR_ERR(data);
>
> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", FAN_FROM_REG(data->fan[attr->index],
> - data->rpm_range));
> + data->rpm_range[attr->index]));
> }
>
> static ssize_t alarm_show(struct device *dev,
> @@ -386,29 +403,41 @@ static struct attribute *max6639_attrs[] = {
> ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(max6639);
>
> /*
> - * returns respective index in rpm_ranges table
> - * 1 by default on invalid range
> + * Get respective index in rpm_ranges table
> */
> -static int rpm_range_to_reg(int range)
> +static int rpm_range_to_index(struct device *dev, u8 *index, int rpm)
> {
> - int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rpm_ranges); i++) {
> - if (rpm_ranges[i] == range)
> - return i;
> + if (rpm < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Set index based on chip support */
> + switch (rpm) {
> + case 0 ... 2000:
> + *index = 0;
> + break;
> + case 2001 ... 4000:
> + *index = 1;
> + break;
> + case 4001 ... 8000:
> + *index = 2;
> + break;
> + case 8001 ... 16000:
> + *index = 3;
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* Use max range for higher RPM */
> + dev_warn(dev,
> + "RPM higher than supported range. Default to 16000 RPM");
> + *index = 3;
> }
> -
> - return 1; /* default: 4000 RPM */
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int max6639_init_client(struct i2c_client *client,
> struct max6639_data *data)
> {
> - struct max6639_platform_data *max6639_info =
> - dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> - int i;
> - int rpm_range = 1; /* default: 4000 RPM */
> - int err;
> + int i, err;
> + struct pwm_state state;
>
> /* Reset chip to default values, see below for GCONFIG setup */
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_GCONFIG,
> @@ -416,51 +445,29 @@ static int max6639_init_client(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (err)
> goto exit;
>
> - /* Fans pulse per revolution is 2 by default */
> - if (max6639_info && max6639_info->ppr > 0 &&
> - max6639_info->ppr < 5)
> - data->ppr = max6639_info->ppr;
> - else
> - data->ppr = 2;
> - data->ppr -= 1;
> -
> - if (max6639_info)
> - rpm_range = rpm_range_to_reg(max6639_info->rpm_range);
> - data->rpm_range = rpm_range;
> -
> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>
> /* Set Fan pulse per revolution */
> - err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_FAN_PPR(i),
> - data->ppr << 6);
> + err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_FAN_PPR(i),
> + data->ppr[i] << 6);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
>
> /* Fans config PWM, RPM */
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG1(i),
> - MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG1_PWM | rpm_range);
> - if (err)
> - goto exit;
> -
> - /* Fans PWM polarity high by default */
> - if (max6639_info && max6639_info->pwm_polarity == 0)
> - err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a(i), 0x00);
> - else
> - err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a(i), 0x02);
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG1(i),
> + MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG1_PWM |
> + data->rpm_range[i]);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
>
> /*
> - * /THERM full speed enable,
> + * /THERM full speed disable,
> * PWM frequency 25kHz, see also GCONFIG below
> */
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG3(i),
> - MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG3_THERM_FULL_SPEED | 0x03);
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG3(i),
> + 0x03);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
>
> @@ -469,31 +476,35 @@ static int max6639_init_client(struct i2c_client *client,
> data->temp_alert[i] = 90;
> data->temp_ot[i] = 100;
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_THERM_LIMIT(i),
> - data->temp_therm[i]);
> + MAX6639_REG_THERM_LIMIT(i),
> + data->temp_therm[i]);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_ALERT_LIMIT(i),
> - data->temp_alert[i]);
> + MAX6639_REG_ALERT_LIMIT(i),
> + data->temp_alert[i]);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_OT_LIMIT(i), data->temp_ot[i]);
> + MAX6639_REG_OT_LIMIT(i),
> + data->temp_ot[i]);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
>
> - /* PWM 120/120 (i.e. 100%) */
> - data->pwm[i] = 120;
> - err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY(i), data->pwm[i]);
> + /* Configure PWM controller */
> + pwm_get_state(data->pwmd[i], &state);
> + pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, data->target_rpm[i],
> + data->max_rpm[i]);
> + err = pwm_apply_state(data->pwmd[i], &state);
> if (err)
> goto exit;
> +
> }
> /* Start monitoring */
> err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_GCONFIG,
> MAX6639_GCONFIG_DISABLE_TIMEOUT | MAX6639_GCONFIG_CH2_LOCAL |
> MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI);
> +
> exit:
> return err;
> }
> @@ -524,12 +535,276 @@ static void max6639_regulator_disable(void *data)
> regulator_disable(data);
> }
>
> +static int max6639_probe_child_from_dt(struct i2c_client *client,
> + struct device_node *child,
> + struct max6639_data *data)
> +
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + u32 i, maxrpm;
> + int val, err;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &i);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing reg property of %pOFn\n", child);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (i >= 2) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid reg %d of %pOFn\n", i, child);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(child, "pulses-per-revolution", &val);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing pulses-per-revolution property of %pOFn",
> + child);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (val < 0 || val > 5) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid pulses-per-revolution %d of %pOFn\n", val,
> + child);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + data->ppr[i] = val;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(child, "max-rpm", &maxrpm);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing max-rpm property of %pOFn\n", child);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = rpm_range_to_index(dev, &data->rpm_range[i], maxrpm);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid max-rpm %d of %pOFn\n", maxrpm, child);
> + return err;
> + }
> + data->max_rpm[i] = maxrpm;
> +
> + err = of_property_read_u32(child, "target-rpm", &val);
> + /* Use provided target RPM else default to maxrpm */
> + if (!err)
> + data->target_rpm[i] = val;
> + else
> + data->target_rpm[i] = maxrpm;
> +
> + /* Get pwms property for PWM control */
> + data->pwmd[i] = devm_fwnode_pwm_get(dev, &child->fwnode, NULL);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(data->pwmd[i]))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (PTR_ERR(data->pwmd[i]) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return PTR_ERR(data->pwmd[i]);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Using chip default PWM");
> + data->pwmd[i] = pwm_request_from_chip(&data->chip, i, NULL);
> + if (!IS_ERR(data->pwmd[i]))
> + return 0;

Are these PWMs usuable at all for a consumer other than the driver
itself? If not I'd doubt the added value of this patch.

> + dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to configure pwm for fan %d", i);
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->pwmd[i]);
> +}
> +
> +static int max6639_probe_from_dt(struct i2c_client *client,
> + struct max6639_data *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> + const struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* Compatible with non-DT platforms */
> + if (!np)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + if (strcmp(child->name, "fan"))
> + continue;
> +
> + err = max6639_probe_child_from_dt(client, child, data);
> + if (err) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct max6639_data *to_max6639_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return container_of(chip, struct max6639_data, chip);
> +}
> +
> +static void max6639_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> +
> + struct max6639_data *data = to_max6639_pwm(chip);
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> + int value, i = pwm->hwpwm, x;

Please use pwm->hwpwm directly instead of i, this makes the code IMHO a
bit more readable.

> + unsigned int freq;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG1(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> +
> + if (value & MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG1_PWM) {
> + state->enabled = true;
> +
> + /* Determine frequency from respective registers */
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG3(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + x = value & MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG3_FREQ_MASK;
> +
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_GCONFIG);
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + if (value & MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI)
> + x |= 0x4;
> + x &= 0x7;
> + freq = freq_table[x];
> +
> + state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, freq);

both NSEC_PER_SEC and freq fit into an unsigned int, so you can use the
(cheaper) DIV_ROUND_UP here.

> +
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + /* max6639 supports 120 slots only */
> + state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(value * state->period,
> + 120);

s/120/MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY_SLOT/ ?

value * state->period might overflow. Use something like
mul_u64_u32_div. (Hmm, there doesn't seem to be a variant for unsigned *
unsigned / unsigned?)

You're loosing precision here. Consider freq = 8333 and TARGTDUTY = 97
then you have state->period = 120005 and calulate duty_cycle as:

DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(97 * 120005, 120) = 97005

. The exact value is (I guess)

97 * NSEC_PER_SEC / (8333 * 120) = 97003.880
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + value &= MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a_PWM_POL;
> + state->polarity = (value != 0);
> + } else
> + state->enabled = false;
> +
> +abort:
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static int max6639_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct max6639_data *data = to_max6639_pwm(chip);
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> + int value = 0, i = pwm->hwpwm, x;

Please use pwm->hwpwm directly instead of i, this makes the code IMHO a
bit more readable.

> + unsigned int freq;
> + struct pwm_state cstate;
> +
> + pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);

Please don't use pwm API functions in PWM callbacks. Accessing
pwm->state is fine here.

> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + if (state->period != cstate.period) {
> + /* Configure frequency */
> + freq = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, state->period);
> + /* Chip supports limited number of frequency */
> + for (x = 0; x < sizeof(freq_table); x++)
> + if (freq < freq_table[x])
> + break;

For state->period = 80000 we get:
freq = 12500

and then x = 7 is picked while x = 6 would be an exact match.

I think you just need

if (freq <= freq_table[x])
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG3(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + value &= ~MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG3_FREQ_MASK;
> + value |= (x & MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG3_FREQ_MASK);
> + value = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG3(i),
> + value);
> +
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_GCONFIG);
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> +
> + if ((value & MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI) && (x >> 2))
> + value &= ~MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI;
> + else
> + value |= MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI;
> + value = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_GCONFIG,
> + value);

Why does it depend on MAX6639_GCONFIG_PWM_FREQ_HI being already set if
you need to set it?

> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + }
> +
> + /* Configure dutycycle */
> + if (state->duty_cycle != cstate.duty_cycle) {

That check is wrong if you go from

.duty_cycle = 50000; .period = 200000
to

.duty_cycle = 50000; .period = 100000

> + value = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(
> + state->duty_cycle * MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY_SLOT,
> + state->period);

Please round down here. (And test with PWM_DEBUG which might have told
you given the right tests.) Also please use the real period to determine
the register value. (Otherwise for a request with

.duty_cycle = 40000; .period = 150000
where a real period of 120004.8 ns is picked you get
MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY_SLOT = 32 which results in a duty cycle of
32001.28 ns, while with MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY_SLOT = 39 you'd get
39001.56 ns.

> + value = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_TARGTDUTY(i),
> + value);
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + }
> +
> + /* Configure polarity */
> + if (state->polarity != cstate.polarity) {
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> + value |= MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a_PWM_POL;
> + else
> + value &= ~MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a_PWM_POL;
> + value = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> + MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG2a(i),
> + value);
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + }
> +
> + if (state->enabled == cstate.enabled)
> + goto abort;

Please use goto only for error handling.

> +
> + value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG1(i));
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + if (state->enabled)
> + value |= MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG1_PWM;
> + else
> + value &= ~MAX6639_FAN_CONFIG1_PWM;
> +
> + value = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MAX6639_REG_FAN_CONFIG1(i),
> + value);
> + if (value < 0)
> + goto abort;
> + value = 0;
> +
> +abort:
> + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> +
> + return value;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops max6639_pwm_ops = {
> + .apply = max6639_pwm_apply,
> + .get_state = max6639_pwm_get_state,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> static int max6639_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> struct max6639_data *data;
> struct device *hwmon_dev;
> - int err;
> + int err, i;
>
> data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct max6639_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data)
> @@ -537,11 +812,26 @@ static int max6639_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> data->client = client;
>
> + /* Add PWM controller of max6639 */
> + data->chip.dev = dev;
> + data->chip.ops = &max6639_pwm_ops;
> + data->chip.npwm = 2;
> + data->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;

Please drop this, of_pwmchip_add() overwrites it anyhow.

> +
> + err = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, &data->chip);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add PWM chip %d\n", err);

dev_err_probe please.

> + return err;
> + }
> +
> data->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "fan");
> if (IS_ERR(data->reg)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(data->reg) != -ENODEV)
> - return PTR_ERR(data->reg);
> -
> + if (PTR_ERR(data->reg) != -ENODEV) {
> + err = (int)PTR_ERR(data->reg);
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed looking up fan supply: %d\n",
> + err);

unrelated change. Also dev_probe_err is better suited here.

> + return err;
> + }
> data->reg = NULL;
> } else {
> /* Spin up fans */
> @@ -560,6 +850,22 @@ static int max6639_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> mutex_init(&data->update_lock);
>
> + /* Below are defaults leter overridden by DT properties */
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + /* 4000 RPM */
> + data->rpm_range[i] = 1;
> + data->ppr[i] = 2;
> + /* Max. temp. 80C/90C/100C */
> + data->temp_therm[i] = 80;
> + data->temp_alert[i] = 90;
> + data->temp_ot[i] = 100;
> + }
> +
> + /* Probe from DT to get configuration */
> + err = max6639_probe_from_dt(client, data);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> /* Initialize the max6639 chip */
> err = max6639_init_client(client, data);
> if (err < 0)
> @@ -571,6 +877,7 @@ static int max6639_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hwmon_dev);
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)

unrelated change

> static int max6639_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> @@ -608,6 +915,7 @@ static int max6639_resume(struct device *dev)
> return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> MAX6639_REG_GCONFIG, ret & ~MAX6639_GCONFIG_STANDBY);
> }
> +#endif
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id max6639_id[] = {
> {"max6639", 0},
> @@ -616,13 +924,22 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id max6639_id[] = {
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, max6639_id);
>
> -static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(max6639_pm_ops, max6639_suspend, max6639_resume);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF

Note that ACPI also uses of_match_table.

> +static const struct of_device_id maxim_of_platform_match[] = {
> + {.compatible = "maxim,max6639"},
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, maxim_of_platform_match);
> +#endif
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(max6639_pm_ops, max6639_suspend, max6639_resume);
>
> static struct i2c_driver max6639_driver = {
> .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> .driver = {
> .name = "max6639",
> .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&max6639_pm_ops),
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(maxim_of_platform_match),
> },
> .probe_new = max6639_probe,
> .id_table = max6639_id,

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-15 18:05    [W:0.101 / U:1.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site