Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Nov 2022 01:35:34 +0200 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/26] x86/sgx: Add 'struct sgx_epc_lru' to encapsulate lru list(s) |
| |
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 10:35:08AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > Introduce a data structure to wrap the existing reclaimable list > and its spinlock in a struct to minimize the code changes needed > to handle multiple LRUs as well as reclaimable and non-reclaimable > lists, both of which will be introduced and used by SGX EPC cgroups. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h > index efb10eacd3aa..aac7d4feb0fa 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h > @@ -91,6 +91,51 @@ static inline void *sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(struct sgx_epc_page *page) > return section->virt_addr + index * PAGE_SIZE; > } > > +struct sgx_epc_lru {
It's not an LRU. It's a data structure containing two LRU's.
Please rename and add a descriptive comment.
> + spinlock_t lock; > + struct list_head reclaimable; > + struct list_head unreclaimable; > +}; > + > +static inline void sgx_lru_init(struct sgx_epc_lru *lru) > +{ > + spin_lock_init(&lru->lock); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lru->reclaimable); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lru->unreclaimable); > +} > + > +/* > + * Must be called with queue lock acquired > + */ > +static inline void __sgx_epc_page_list_push(struct list_head *list, struct sgx_epc_page *page) > +{ > + list_add_tail(&page->list, list); > +} > + > +/* > + * Must be called with queue lock acquired > + */ > +static inline struct sgx_epc_page * __sgx_epc_page_list_pop(struct list_head *list) > +{ > + struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page; > + > + if (list_empty(list)) > + return NULL; > + > + epc_page = list_first_entry(list, struct sgx_epc_page, list); > + list_del_init(&epc_page->list); > + return epc_page; > +} > + > +#define sgx_epc_pop_reclaimable(lru) \ > + __sgx_epc_page_list_pop(&(lru)->reclaimable) > +#define sgx_epc_push_reclaimable(lru, page) \ > + __sgx_epc_page_list_push(&(lru)->reclaimable, page) > +#define sgx_epc_pop_unreclaimable(lru) \ > + __sgx_epc_page_list_pop(&(lru)->unreclaimable) > +#define sgx_epc_push_unreclaimable(lru, page) \ > + __sgx_epc_page_list_push(&(lru)->unreclaimable, page)
Is there any reason not to declare these as inline functions?
> + > struct sgx_epc_page *__sgx_alloc_epc_page(void); > void sgx_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page); > > -- > 2.37.3 >
BR, Jarkko
| |