lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CET shadow stack app compatibility
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 05:04:40PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > ELF bits should not, must not, be called CET. API, not CET, Compiler
> > features, also not CET.
>
> So the arch_prctl()s can't be shared between shadow stack and IBT? They
> don't have to be, but this is a new thing after a fair amount of
> earlier discussion.

I would very strongly suggest IBT not use that interface and instead we
follow ARM64 BTI's lead -- such that application developers don't go
insane trying to use two nearly identical solutions.

I mean, the toolchain folks made a godawefull mess of things, but we
don't have to.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-15 20:39    [W:0.151 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site