Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:23:06 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Allow livepatch module add trace event |
| |
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 16:02:36 +0000 Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the case of keeping the system running, the preferred method for > tracing the kernel is dynamic tracing (kprobe), but the drawback of > this method is that events are lost, especially when tracing packages > in the network stack.
I'm not against this change, but the above is where I'm a bit confused. How are events more likely to be lost with kprobes over a static event?
-- Steve
| |