lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v3] bus: mhi: host: Disable preemption while processing data events
Date
If data processing of an event is scheduled out because core
is busy handling multiple irqs, this can starve the processing
of MHI M0 state change event on another core. Fix this issue by
disabling irq on the core processing data events.

Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
---
v2->v3: modify the comment
v1->v2: add comments about why we disable local irq

drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
index f3aef77a..5dca0a0 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
@@ -1027,13 +1027,20 @@ int mhi_process_data_event_ring(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,

void mhi_ev_task(unsigned long data)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
struct mhi_event *mhi_event = (struct mhi_event *)data;
struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl = mhi_event->mhi_cntrl;

/* process all pending events */
- spin_lock_bh(&mhi_event->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * When multiple IRQs come, the tasklet will be scheduled out with event ring lock
+ * remaining acquired, causing M0 event process on another core gets stuck when it
+ * tries to acquire the same event ring lock. Thus, let's disable local IRQs here.
+ */
+
mhi_event->process_event(mhi_cntrl, mhi_event, U32_MAX);
- spin_unlock_bh(&mhi_event->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mhi_event->lock, flags);
}

void mhi_ctrl_ev_task(unsigned long data)
--
2.7.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-11-15 03:24    [W:0.093 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site