lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.19 195/229] drm/amd/display: fix overflow on MIN_I64 definition
Hi!

> From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 6ae0632d17759852c07e2d1e0a31c728eb6ba246 ]
>
> The definition of MIN_I64 in bw_fixed.c can cause gcc to whinge about
> integer overflow, because it is treated as a positive value, which is
> then negated. The temporary positive value is not necessarily
> representable.
>
> This causes the following warning:
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c:30:19:
> warning: integer overflow in expression ‘-9223372036854775808’ of type
> ‘long long int’ results in ‘-9223372036854775808’ [-Woverflow]
> 30 | (int64_t)(-(1LL << 63))
> | ^
>
> Writing out (-MAX_I64 - 1) works instead.

While this probably fixes the warning, better fix would be to include
limits.h which already has equivalent definitions.

Thanks and best regards,
Pavel

> -#define MIN_I64 \
> - (int64_t)(-(1LL << 63))
> -
> #define MAX_I64 \
> (int64_t)((1ULL << 63) - 1)
>
> +#define MIN_I64 \
> + (-MAX_I64 - 1)
> +
> #define FRACTIONAL_PART_MASK \
> ((1ULL << BW_FIXED_BITS_PER_FRACTIONAL_PART) - 1)
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
>

--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-25 10:23    [W:0.748 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site