Messages in this thread | | | From | Wayne Chang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 06/11] usb: typec: ucsi_ccg: Replace ccgx to well-known regex | Date | Tue, 25 Oct 2022 07:26:45 +0000 |
| |
Thanks for the review.
On 10/24/22 16:46, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 11:29:27AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> writes: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 03:41:23PM +0800, Wayne Chang wrote: >>>> ccgx is refer to the cypress cypd4226 typec controller. >>>> Replace ccgx to well-known regex "cypress". >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Wayne Chang <waynec@nvidia.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c >>>> index 139707a2f3d6..5d3099e6eb77 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_ccg.c >>>> @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static int ucsi_ccg_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >>>> INIT_WORK(&uc->pm_work, ccg_pm_workaround_work); >>>> >>>> /* Only fail FW flashing when FW build information is not provided */ >>>> - status = device_property_read_u16(dev, "ccgx,firmware-build", >>>> + status = device_property_read_u16(dev, "cypress,firmware-build", >>>> &uc->fw_build); >>>> if (status) >>>> dev_err(uc->dev, "failed to get FW build information\n"); >>> >>> This will break bisectability. You need to first add that >>> "cyppress,firmware-build" identifier without removing the old >>> "ccgx,firmware-build" identifier, and then introduce a separate >>> clean-up patch where you remove it when it's safe to remove: >>> >>> 1. Add new - This patch. >>> 2. Modify users - PATCH 7/11. >>> 3. Remove old - *missing*. >>
thanks for the guidance. will update the changes in the next patchset.
thanks, Wayne.
>> will it ever be safe to remove? What about potential products in the >> market with little to no upgrade path? There are likely to be products >> with a DTB that will never be updated, no? > > Not the case here. OF support is only just added to this driver in > this series. That old identifier has been used as a build-in property > only. > > thanks, > > -- > heikki >
| |