Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:02:23 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/drivers/mellanox: Use generic thermal_zone_get_trip() function | From | Daniel Lezcano <> |
| |
Hi Ido,
On 18/10/2022 08:28, Ido Schimmel wrote: > + Vadim > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:32:51AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> The thermal framework gives the possibility to register the trip >> points with the thermal zone. When that is done, no get_trip_* ops are >> needed and they can be removed. >> >> Convert ops content logic into generic trip points and register them with the >> thermal zone. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > > Vadim, can you please review and test? > > Daniel, I saw that you wrote to Kalle that you want to take it via the > thermal tree. Any reason not to take it via net-next? I'm asking because > it will be the second release in a row where we need to try to avoid > conflicts in this file.
Because I hope I can remove the ops->get_trip_ ops from thermal_ops structure before the end of this cycle.
May be you can consider moving the thermal driver into drivers/thermal?
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |