lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more appropriate Error code
From
On 10/21/2022 1:34 PM, Jithu Joseph wrote:
> scan_chunks_sanity_check() was returning -ENOMEM if it encounters
> an error while copying IFS test image from memory to Secure Memory.
>

Same as before:

s/was returning/returns

> Return -EIO in this scenario, as it is more appropriate.
>

Do the first 3 patches need a 'Fixes' tag? Or is the idea here that the
feature isn't truly enabled so everything before removing the BROKEN tag
will be considered together?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-25 02:34    [W:0.883 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site