| Date | Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:57:21 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: return a more appropriate Error code | From | Sohil Mehta <> |
| |
On 10/21/2022 1:34 PM, Jithu Joseph wrote: > scan_chunks_sanity_check() was returning -ENOMEM if it encounters > an error while copying IFS test image from memory to Secure Memory. >
Same as before:
s/was returning/returns
> Return -EIO in this scenario, as it is more appropriate. >
Do the first 3 patches need a 'Fixes' tag? Or is the idea here that the feature isn't truly enabled so everything before removing the BROKEN tag will be considered together?
|