lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] asm-generic/io: Add _RET_IP_ to MMIO trace for more accurate debug info
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:04:50 +0530
Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com> wrote:

> Due to compiler optimizations like inlining, there are cases where
> MMIO traces using _THIS_IP_ for caller information might not be
> sufficient to provide accurate debug traces.
>
> 1) With optimizations (Seen with GCC):
>
> In this case, _THIS_IP_ works fine and prints the caller information
> since it will be inlined into the caller and we get the debug traces
> on who made the MMIO access, for ex:
>
> rwmmio_read: qcom_smmu_tlb_sync+0xe0/0x1b0 width=32 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
> rwmmio_post_read: qcom_smmu_tlb_sync+0xe0/0x1b0 width=32 val=0x0 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
>
> 2) Without optimizations (Seen with Clang):
>
> _THIS_IP_ will not be sufficient in this case as it will print only
> the MMIO accessors itself which is of not much use since it is not
> inlined as below for example:
>
> rwmmio_read: readl+0x4/0x80 width=32 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
> rwmmio_post_read: readl+0x48/0x80 width=32 val=0x4 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
>
> So in order to handle this second case as well irrespective of the compiler
> optimizations, add _RET_IP_ to MMIO trace to make it provide more accurate
> debug information in all these scenarios.
>
> Before:
>
> rwmmio_read: readl+0x4/0x80 width=32 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
> rwmmio_post_read: readl+0x48/0x80 width=32 val=0x4 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
>
> After:
>
> rwmmio_read: qcom_smmu_tlb_sync+0xe0/0x1b0 -> readl+0x4/0x80 width=32 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
> rwmmio_post_read: qcom_smmu_tlb_sync+0xe0/0x1b0 -> readl+0x4/0x80 width=32 val=0x0 addr=0xffff8000087447f4
>
> Fixes: 210031971cdd ("asm-generic/io: Add logging support for MMIO accessors")
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>


Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

What tree should this go through?

-- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-24 22:07    [W:0.087 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site