lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH Part2 v6 42/49] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
From
On 10/21/22 16:12, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On 10/21/2022 2:06 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 6/20/22 18:13, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>>> From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Version 2 of GHCB specification added the support for two SNP Guest
>>> Request Message NAE events. The events allows for an SEV-SNP guest to
>>> make request to the SEV-SNP firmware through hypervisor using the
>>> SNP_GUEST_REQUEST API define in the SEV-SNP firmware specification.
>>>
>>> The SNP_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST is similar to SNP_GUEST_REQUEST with the
>>> difference of an additional certificate blob that can be passed through
>>> the SNP_SET_CONFIG ioctl defined in the CCP driver. The CCP driver
>>> provides snp_guest_ext_guest_request() that is used by the KVM to get
>>> both the report and certificate data at once.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>   arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |   2 +
>>>   2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
>>> index 7fc0fad87054..089af21a4efe 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
>>
>>> +static void snp_handle_ext_guest_request(struct vcpu_svm *svm, gpa_t
>>> req_gpa, gpa_t resp_gpa)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct sev_data_snp_guest_request req = {0};
>>> +    struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
>>> +    struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>>> +    unsigned long data_npages;
>>> +    struct kvm_sev_info *sev;
>>> +    unsigned long rc, err;
>>> +    u64 data_gpa;
>>> +
>>> +    if (!sev_snp_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
>>> +        rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_GUEST;
>>> +        goto e_fail;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>>> +
>>> +    data_gpa = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
>>> +    data_npages = vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX];
>>> +
>>> +    if (!IS_ALIGNED(data_gpa, PAGE_SIZE)) {
>>> +        rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
>>> +        goto e_fail;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Verify that requested blob will fit in certificate buffer */
>>> +    if ((data_npages << PAGE_SHIFT) > SEV_FW_BLOB_MAX_SIZE) {
>>
>> Not sure this is a valid check...  Isn't it OK if the guest has supplied
>> more room than is required? If the guest supplies 8 pages and the
>> hypervisor only needs to copy 1 page of data (or the
>> SEV_FW_BLOB_MAX_SIZE number of pages) that shouldn't be an error. I
>> think this check can go, right?
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
> The check should probably be
>  if ((data_npages << PAGE_SHIFT) < SEV_FW_BLOB_MAX_SIZE)

No, the check should just be removed. If the number of pages required to
hold the cert data is only 1, then a data_npages value of 1 is just fine
(see below).

>
> and that check already exists in:
>
> snp_guest_ext_guest_request(...)
> {
> ...
> ...
>    /*
>          * Check if there is enough space to copy the certificate chain.
> Otherwise
>          * return ERROR code defined in the GHCB specification.
>          */
>         expected_npages = sev->snp_certs_len >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>         if (*npages < expected_npages) {

If expected_npages is 1, then an *npages value of 1 is OK. But if you put
the check in above that you want, you would never get here with an *npages
value of 1.

Thanks,
Tom

>                 *npages = expected_npages;
>                 *fw_err = SNP_GUEST_REQ_INVALID_LEN;
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
> ...
>
> Thanks,
> Ashish
>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>>> +        rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_PARAM;
>>> +        goto e_fail;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    mutex_lock(&sev->guest_req_lock);
>>> +
>>> +    rc = snp_setup_guest_buf(svm, &req, req_gpa, resp_gpa);
>>> +    if (rc)
>>> +        goto unlock;
>>> +
>>> +    rc = snp_guest_ext_guest_request(&req, (unsigned
>>> long)sev->snp_certs_data,
>>> +                     &data_npages, &err);
>>> +    if (rc) {
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * If buffer length is small then return the expected
>>> +         * length in rbx.
>>> +         */
>>> +        if (err == SNP_GUEST_REQ_INVALID_LEN)
>>> +            vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] = data_npages;
>>> +
>>> +        /* pass the firmware error code */
>>> +        rc = err;
>>> +        goto cleanup;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Copy the certificate blob in the guest memory */
>>> +    if (data_npages &&
>>> +        kvm_write_guest(kvm, data_gpa, sev->snp_certs_data,
>>> data_npages << PAGE_SHIFT))
>>> +        rc = SEV_RET_INVALID_ADDRESS;
>>> +
>>> +cleanup:
>>> +    snp_cleanup_guest_buf(&req, &rc);
>>> +
>>> +unlock:
>>> +    mutex_unlock(&sev->guest_req_lock);
>>> +
>>> +e_fail:
>>> +    svm_set_ghcb_sw_exit_info_2(vcpu, rc);
>>> +}
>>> +

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-21 23:31    [W:0.262 / U:3.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site