Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:11:04 +0200 | From | David Sterba <> | Subject | Re: Bug 216559 - btrfs crash root mount RAID0 caused by ac0677348f3c2 |
| |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 02:00:30PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 14.10.22 13:07, David Sterba wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 02:09:50PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. > >> > >> David, I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org apparently > >> caused by a changed of yours. As many (most?) kernel developer don't > >> keep an eye on the bug-tracker, I decided to forward the report by mail. > >> Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216559 : > > > > Thanks, you don't need to forward the mails as I'm on CC of all bugzilla > > updates where the btrfs virtual assignee is also present. > > Hmmm. Do you want to make my life easier or want to get less mail? I > thought about this for a while. Unless you strongly object, I would like > to continue forwarding them for the following reasons: > > * you might be on vacation or AFK for other reasons; your Comaintainers > that were CCed would know and likely then help out > * CCing the list makes other people notice the issue and gives them a > chance to help (Qu Wenruo replied in bugzilla shortly after I sent the > mail you quoted, which might or might not be due to my mail). > * regression tracking is hard already; it would make it a lot harder if > I'm forced to make and maintain notes how each and every maintainer > would like me to handle situations like this > * right now I need to send one mail anyway to add a regression to the > tracking
No problem with continuing the way it is, the reasons above make sense.
| |