Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Oct 2022 22:22:15 -0700 | From | Kees Cook <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT |
| |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:31:48PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > Is there a reason not to default to FineIBT if the hardware supports it?
I think it's a fine default. Given the behavioral differences, though, I'd like to make it configurable.
> If we're going to give the user choices then my previous rant about > documentation still applies: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/20220503220244.vyz5flk3gg3y6rbw@treble
Totally agreed. I would be happy to pen something if no one else is interested.
-- Kees Cook
| |