Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Oct 2022 15:49:07 +0200 | From | Miquel Raynal <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree with the mtd-fixes tree |
| |
Hi,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:08:07 +1100:
> Hi Rafał, > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:31:57 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> wrote: > > > > this isn't exactly the correct fix, of_node_get() is still needed. > > > > I'll make sure we let Linus know about this conflict (and solution) when > > sending 6.2 pull request. > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > > index 07249af4f890..20fcedc3021e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c > > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void mtd_check_of_node(struct mtd_info *mtd) > > if (!mtd_is_partition(mtd)) > > return; > > > > - parent_dn = mtd_get_of_node(mtd->parent); > > + parent_dn = of_node_get(mtd_get_of_node(mtd->parent)); > > if (!parent_dn) > > return; > > > > > Thanks for checking. I have added that to my resolution for tomorrow > onward.
Thanks Rafał for the right resolution and Stephen for carrying the fix. I'll send the fixes PR soon and rebase on top of an -rc containing it to avoid this conflict resolution to be needed when sending the final PR to Linus during the next MW.
Thanks, Miquèl
| |