Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:18:40 +0200 | From | Andrew Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] (attempt to) Fix RISC-V toolchain extension support detection |
| |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:03:48PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > However, we could also drop the compiler and linker checking if we > > converted our use of cbo.* to the insn-def.h framework (I think Heiko once > > mentioned looking at doing that, but I'm not sure.) I'm looking at adding > > Zicboz support right now and for starters I've duplicated and modified > > these checks. But, I think I'll look into defining the instruction type > > needed for cbo.* and using insn-def instead. > > What is the ETA of your zicboz support? Do you think these patches > should be applied to v6.1 & backported before being replaced by insn-def > when your zicboz support arrives? Or just wait for your zicboz series?
I hope to have something posted by the end of this week, so if all things go well, it could land in 6.1. I think it's reasonable to merge your patches anyway, though, as they fix the current code and we don't know what rabbit holes I may fall in with my series yet.
Thanks, drew
> > Trying to decide what status I should set for this in patchwork. > > Thanks, > Conor. >
| |