Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:13:14 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document rradc node | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 17/10/2022 14:51, Caleb Connolly wrote: > Document the rradc node name, like adc-tm it's only used on a few > platforms, so differentiate it from the standard adc node. > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org> > --- > > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221016175757.1911016-1-caleb.connolly@linaro.org/ > Changes since v1: > * Add a new node instead of using the adc@ node > * no longer depend on Luca's patch
This is not what I proposed. The node name should stay adc as it is generic. I propose to do it the same way as in f4b632da13cf0ee39cdbd4ff08d1961ed50e3c14
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |