Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Ashok Raj <> | Subject | [PATCH 08/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add minimum required revision to microcode header | Date | Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:09:08 -0700 |
| |
In general users don't have the necessary information to determine whether a late loading of a new microcode version has removed any feature (MSR, CPUID etc) between what is currently loaded and this new microcode. To address this issue, Intel has added a "minimum required version" field to a previously reserved field in the file header. Microcode updates should only be applied if the current microcode version is equal to, or greater than this minimum required version.
Thomas made some suggestions[1] on how meta-data in the microcode file could provide Linux with information to decide if the new microcode is suitable candidate for late loading. But even the "simpler" option#1 requires a lot of metadata and corresponding kernel code to parse it.
The proposal here is an even simpler option. Simply "OS visible features" such as CPUID and MSRs are the only two examples. The microcode must not change these OS visible features because they cause problems after late loading. When microcode changes features, microcode will change the min_rev to prevent such microcodes from being late loaded.
Pseudo code for late loading is as follows:
if header.min_required_id == 0 This is old format microcode, block late loading else if current_ucode_version < header.min_required_id Current version is too old, block late loading of this microcode. else OK to proceed with late loading.
Any microcode that modifies the interface to an OS-visible feature will set the min_version to itself. This will enforce this microcode is not suitable for late loading unless the currently loaded revision is greater or equal to the new microcode affecting the change.
The enforcement is not in hardware and limited to kernel loader enforcing the requirement. It is not required for early loading of microcode to enforce this requirement, since the new features are only evaluated after early loading in the boot process.
Test cases covered:
1. With new kernel, attempting to load an older format microcode with the min_rev=0 should be blocked by kernel.
[ 210.541802] Late loading denied: Microcode header does not specify a required min version.
2. New microcode with a non-zero min_rev in the header, but the specified min_rev is greater than what is currently loaded in the CPU should be blocked by kernel.
245.139828] microcode: Late loading denied: Current revision 0x8f685300 is too old to update, must be at 0xaa000050 version or higher. Use early loading instead.
3. New microcode with a min_rev < currently loaded should allow loading the microcode
4. Build initrd with microcode that has min_rev=0, or min_rev > currently loaded should permit early loading microcode from initrd.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/alpine.DEB.2.21.1909062237580.1902@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Tested-by: William Xie <william.xie@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 4 +++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h index 4c92cea7e4b5..bc893dd68b82 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ struct microcode_header_intel { unsigned int pf; unsigned int datasize; unsigned int totalsize; - unsigned int reserved[3]; + unsigned int reserved1; + unsigned int min_req_ver; + unsigned int reserved3; }; struct microcode_intel { diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index e08777ae9cc4..46edce811c69 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -163,13 +163,14 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, void *data, unsigne intel_ucode_patch = p->data; } -static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err) +static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err, bool late_loading) { unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size; struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc; struct extended_sigtable *ext_header = NULL; u32 sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i; struct extended_signature *ext_sig; + struct ucode_cpu_info uci; total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); data_size = get_datasize(mc_header); @@ -240,6 +241,24 @@ static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err) return -EINVAL; } + /* + * When late-loading, enforce that the current revision loaded on + * the CPU is equal or greater than the value specified in the + * new microcode header + */ + if (late_loading) { + if (!mc_header->min_req_ver) { + pr_warn("Late loading denied: Microcode header does not specify a required min version\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci); + if (uci.cpu_sig.rev < mc_header->min_req_ver) { + pr_warn("Late loading denied: Current revision 0x%x too old to update, must be at 0x%x or higher. Use early loading instead\n", + uci.cpu_sig.rev, mc_header->min_req_ver); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + if (!ext_table_size) return 0; @@ -281,7 +300,7 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save) mc_size = get_totalsize(mc_header); if (!mc_size || mc_size > size || - microcode_sanity_check(data, 0) < 0) + microcode_sanity_check(data, 0, false) < 0) break; size -= mc_size; @@ -835,7 +854,7 @@ static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, struct iov_iter *iter) memcpy(mc, &mc_header, sizeof(mc_header)); data = mc + sizeof(mc_header); if (!copy_from_iter_full(data, data_size, iter) || - microcode_sanity_check(mc, 1) < 0) { + microcode_sanity_check(mc, 1, true) < 0) { break; } -- 2.34.1
| |