lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 1/2] clk: Update req_rate on __clk_recalc_rates()
Commit cb1b1dd96241 ("clk: Set req_rate on reparenting") introduced a
new function, clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(), that updates the
req_rate field on reparenting.

It turns out that that function will interfere with the clock notifying
done by __clk_recalc_rates(). This ends up reporting the new rate in
both the old_rate and new_rate fields of struct clk_notifier_data.

Since clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates() is basically
__clk_recalc_rates() without the notifiers, and with the req_rate field
update, we can drop clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates() entirely, and
make __clk_recalc_rates() update req_rate.

However, __clk_recalc_rates() is being called in several code paths:
when retrieving a rate (most likely through clk_get_rate()), when changing
parents (through clk_set_rate() or clk_hw_reparent()), or when updating
the orphan status (through clk_core_reparent_orphans_nolock(), called at
registration).

Updating req_rate on reparenting or initialisation makes sense, but we
shouldn't do it on clk_get_rate(). Thus an extra flag has been added to
update or not req_rate depending on the context.

Fixes: cb1b1dd96241 ("clk: Set req_rate on reparenting")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/0acc7217-762c-7c0d-45a0-55c384824ce4@samsung.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/Y0QNSx+ZgqKSvPOC@sirena.org.uk/
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 39 +++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index dee5f39bfa90..c3c3f8c07258 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1759,6 +1759,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_recalc(struct clk_core *core,
/**
* __clk_recalc_rates
* @core: first clk in the subtree
+ * @update_req: Whether req_rate should be updated with the new rate
* @msg: notification type (see include/linux/clk.h)
*
* Walks the subtree of clks starting with clk and recalculates rates as it
@@ -1768,7 +1769,8 @@ static unsigned long clk_recalc(struct clk_core *core,
* clk_recalc_rates also propagates the POST_RATE_CHANGE notification,
* if necessary.
*/
-static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, unsigned long msg)
+static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, bool update_req,
+ unsigned long msg)
{
unsigned long old_rate;
unsigned long parent_rate = 0;
@@ -1782,6 +1784,8 @@ static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, unsigned long msg)
parent_rate = core->parent->rate;

core->rate = clk_recalc(core, parent_rate);
+ if (update_req)
+ core->req_rate = core->rate;

/*
* ignore NOTIFY_STOP and NOTIFY_BAD return values for POST_RATE_CHANGE
@@ -1791,13 +1795,13 @@ static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, unsigned long msg)
__clk_notify(core, msg, old_rate, core->rate);

hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
- __clk_recalc_rates(child, msg);
+ __clk_recalc_rates(child, update_req, msg);
}

static unsigned long clk_core_get_rate_recalc(struct clk_core *core)
{
if (core && (core->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE))
- __clk_recalc_rates(core, 0);
+ __clk_recalc_rates(core, false, 0);

return clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
}
@@ -1900,23 +1904,6 @@ static void clk_core_update_orphan_status(struct clk_core *core, bool is_orphan)
clk_core_update_orphan_status(child, is_orphan);
}

-/*
- * Update the orphan rate and req_rate of @core and all its children.
- */
-static void clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(struct clk_core *core)
-{
- struct clk_core *child;
- unsigned long parent_rate = 0;
-
- if (core->parent)
- parent_rate = core->parent->rate;
-
- core->rate = core->req_rate = clk_recalc(core, parent_rate);
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
- clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(child);
-}
-
static void clk_reparent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *new_parent)
{
bool was_orphan = core->orphan;
@@ -1986,8 +1973,6 @@ static struct clk_core *__clk_set_parent_before(struct clk_core *core,
clk_reparent(core, parent);
clk_enable_unlock(flags);

- clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(core);
-
return old_parent;
}

@@ -2033,7 +2018,6 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent,
clk_reparent(core, old_parent);
clk_enable_unlock(flags);

- clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(core);
__clk_set_parent_after(core, old_parent, parent);

return ret;
@@ -2657,9 +2641,8 @@ static void clk_core_reparent(struct clk_core *core,
struct clk_core *new_parent)
{
clk_reparent(core, new_parent);
- clk_core_update_orphan_child_rates(core);
__clk_recalc_accuracies(core);
- __clk_recalc_rates(core, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
+ __clk_recalc_rates(core, true, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
}

void clk_hw_reparent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *new_parent)
@@ -2743,9 +2726,9 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent_nolock(struct clk_core *core,

/* propagate rate an accuracy recalculation accordingly */
if (ret) {
- __clk_recalc_rates(core, ABORT_RATE_CHANGE);
+ __clk_recalc_rates(core, true, ABORT_RATE_CHANGE);
} else {
- __clk_recalc_rates(core, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
+ __clk_recalc_rates(core, true, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
__clk_recalc_accuracies(core);
}

@@ -3642,7 +3625,7 @@ static void clk_core_reparent_orphans_nolock(void)
__clk_set_parent_before(orphan, parent);
__clk_set_parent_after(orphan, parent, NULL);
__clk_recalc_accuracies(orphan);
- __clk_recalc_rates(orphan, 0);
+ __clk_recalc_rates(orphan, true, 0);

/*
* __clk_init_parent() will set the initial req_rate to
--
b4 0.11.0-dev-7da52

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-10 16:48    [W:2.127 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site