lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: PSI idle-shutoff
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:57 AM Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 Sep 2022 19:38:17 +0530 Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com>
> > Hi
> >
> > The fact that psi_avgs_work()->collect_percpu_times()->get_recent_times()
> > run from a kworker thread, PSI_NONIDLE condition would be observed as
> > there is a RUNNING task. So we would always end up re-arming the work.
> >
> > If the work is re-armed from the psi_avgs_work() it self, the backing off
> > logic in psi_task_change() (will be moved to psi_task_switch soon) can't
> > help. The work is already scheduled. so we don't do anything there.
> >
> > Probably I am missing some thing here. Can you please clarify how we
> > shut off re-arming the psi avg work?
>
> Instead of open coding schedule_delayed_work() in bid to check if timer
> hits the idle task (see delayed_work_timer_fn()), the idle task is tracked
> in psi_task_switch() and checked by kworker to see if it preempted the idle
> task.
>
> Only for thoughts now.
>
> Hillf
>
> +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ static u64 update_averages(struct psi_gr
> return avg_next_update;
> }
>
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, prev_task_is_idle);
> +
> static void psi_avgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct delayed_work *dwork;
> @@ -439,7 +441,7 @@ static void psi_avgs_work(struct work_st
> if (now >= group->avg_next_update)
> group->avg_next_update = update_averages(group, now);
>
> - if (nonidle) {
> + if (nonidle && 0 == per_cpu(prev_task_is_idle, raw_smp_processor_id())) {

This condition would be incorrect if nonidle was set by a cpu other
than raw_smp_processor_id() and
prev_task_is_idle[raw_smp_processor_id()] == 0. IOW, if some activity
happens on a non-current cpu, we would fail to reschedule
psi_avgs_work for it. This can be fixed in collect_percpu_times() by
considering prev_task_is_idle for all other CPUs as well. However
Chengming's approach seems simpler to me TBH and does not require an
additional per-cpu variable.

> schedule_delayed_work(dwork, nsecs_to_jiffies(
> group->avg_next_update - now) + 1);
> }
> @@ -859,6 +861,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct
> if (prev->pid) {
> int clear = TSK_ONCPU, set = 0;
>
> + per_cpu(prev_task_is_idle, cpu) = 0;
> /*
> * When we're going to sleep, psi_dequeue() lets us
> * handle TSK_RUNNING, TSK_MEMSTALL_RUNNING and
> @@ -888,7 +891,8 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct
> for (; group; group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter))
> psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
> }
> - }
> + } else
> + per_cpu(prev_task_is_idle, cpu) = 1;
> }
>
> /**
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-10-10 23:17    [W:0.275 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site