lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 09/33] iommu/mediatek: Remove for_each_m4u in tlb_sync_all
From
Date
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 16:55 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 23/09/21 13:58, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > The tlb_sync_all is called from these three functions:
> > a) flush_iotlb_all: it will be called for each a iommu HW.
> > b) tlb_flush_range_sync: it already has for_each_m4u.
> > c) in irq: When IOMMU HW translation fault, Only need flush itself.
> >
> > Thus, No need for_each_m4u in this tlb_sync_all. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 6f4f6624e3ac..0b4c30baa864 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -206,19 +206,15 @@ static struct mtk_iommu_domain
> > *to_mtk_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
> >
> > static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > {
> > - struct list_head *head = data->hw_list;
> > -
> > - for_each_m4u(data, head) {
> > - if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(data->dev) <= 0)
> > - continue;
> > + if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(data->dev) <= 0)
> > + return;
> >
> > - writel_relaxed(F_INVLD_EN1 | F_INVLD_EN0,
> > - data->base + data->plat_data-
> > >inv_sel_reg);
> > - writel_relaxed(F_ALL_INVLD, data->base +
> > REG_MMU_INVALIDATE);
> > - wmb(); /* Make sure the tlb flush all done */
> > + writel_relaxed(F_INVLD_EN1 | F_INVLD_EN0,
> > + data->base + data->plat_data->inv_sel_reg);
> > + writel_relaxed(F_ALL_INVLD, data->base + REG_MMU_INVALIDATE);
> > + wmb(); /* Make sure the tlb flush all done */
>
> There aren't a lot of writes here - not anymore, since you are no
> longer doing
> this for_each_m4u()...
> ...so, please change writel_relaxed() to writel() calls, allowing you
> to also
> remove the write barrier at the end (since in the non relaxed
> version, order is already ensured).

In the "writel", the "__iowmb()" runs before "write_relaxed". Then how
to guarantee the last register was wrote into the HW. Here the flush
all don't have sync(waiting it complete)

>
> >
> > - pm_runtime_put(data->dev);
> > - }
> > + pm_runtime_put(data->dev);
> > }
> >
> > static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_range_sync(unsigned long iova,
> > size_t size,
> >

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-09 03:48    [W:0.797 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site