lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix missing unlock in at_xdmac_tasklet()
Date
On 1/7/22 4:40 AM, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Add the missing unlock before return from at_xdmac_tasklet().
>
> Fixes: e77e561925df ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix race over irq_status")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index a1da2b4b6d73..1476156af74b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -1681,8 +1681,10 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> __func__, atchan->irq_status);
>
> if (!(atchan->irq_status & AT_XDMAC_CIS_LIS) &&
> - !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask))
> + !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask)) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock);
> return;

oh yes, thanks!
you can directly return spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock); to avoid the extra braces.
Anyway, it's good:
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>

> + }
>
> if (atchan->irq_status & error_mask)
> at_xdmac_handle_error(atchan);
> --
> 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-07 08:26    [W:0.054 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site