lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: cpufreq: intel_pstate: map utilization into the pstate range
From
Date
On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 21:43 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > All the turbostat output and graphs I have sent recently were
> > > just
> > > for
> > > continuous spinning:
> > >
> > > for(;;);
> > >
> > > Now I am trying running for the percentage of the time
> > > corresponding
> > > to
> > > 10 / P for pstate P (ie 0.5 of the time for pstate 20), and then
> > > sleeping,
> > > to see whether one can just add the sleeping power consumption of
> > > the
> > > machine to compute the efficiency as Rafael suggested.
> > >
> > Before doing comparison try freezing uncore.
> >
> > wrmsr -a 0x620 0x0808
> >
> > to Freeze uncore at 800MHz. Any other value is fine.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.  What is the impact of this?
Uncore scales based on its own heuristics based in P-state change and
works in package scope. So to actually see the effect of P-state change
on energy you can remove variability of uncore power.

Thanks,
Srinivas

>
> julia


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-06 22:57    [W:1.525 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site