lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: kpc2000: kpc2000_spi: Check for null pointer after calling devm_ioremap
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:22:57PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> As the possible failure of the allocation, the devm_ioremap() may return
> NULL pointer.
> Then the kpspi->base is assigned to cs->base in kp_spi_setup() and used
> in kp_spi_read_reg() and kp_spi_write_reg().
> Therefore, it should be better to add the sanity check and return error
> in order to avoid the dereference of the NULL pointer.
>
> Fixes: 677b993a5749 ("staging: kpc2000: kpc_spi: use devm_* API to manage mapped I/O space")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c
> index 16ca18b8aa15..ead4aa0c988c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000_spi.c
> @@ -466,6 +466,10 @@ kp_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pldev)
>
> kpspi->base = devm_ioremap(&pldev->dev, r->start,
> resource_size(r));
> + if (!kpspi->base) {
> + status = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_master;
> + }
>
> status = spi_register_master(master);
> if (status < 0) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>


Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch did not apply to any known trees that Greg is in control
of. Possibly this is because you made it against Linus's tree, not
the linux-next tree, which is where all of the development for the
next version of the kernel is at. Please refresh your patch against
the linux-next tree, or even better yet, the development tree
specified in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem you are submitting
a patch for, and resend it.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-06 15:03    [W:0.062 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site