Messages in this thread | | | From | Naresh Kamboju <> | Date | Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:38:16 +0530 | Subject | Re: txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '0' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t' {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=] |
| |
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 16:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 03:39:09PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > While building selftests the following warnings were noticed for arm > > architecture on Linux stable v5.15.13 kernel and also on Linus's tree. > > > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -Wall -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2 -g > > -I../../../../usr/include/ txtimestamp.c -o > > /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/kselftest/net/txtimestamp > > txtimestamp.c: In function 'validate_timestamp': > > txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '0' expects argument of type > > 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t' {aka 'long long > > int'} [-Wformat=] > > 164 | fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: 0 us expected between 0 and 0\n",
<trim>
> Same question as before, is this a regression, and if so, any pointers > to a fix?
This is a known warning on Linus's tree. The fix should come from Linus's tree.
- Naresh
| |