lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 0/9] Multigenerational LRU Framework
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:25:27AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 03:53:07 -0700 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:55:34AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > Hi Yu,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:22:19 -0700 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > I think similar works are already available out of the box with the latest
> > > mainline tree, though it might be suboptimal in some cases.
> >
> > Ok, I will sound harsh because I hate it when people challenge facts
> > while having no idea what they are talking about.
> >
> > Our jobs are help the leadership make best decisions by providing them
> > with facts, not feeding them crap.
>
> I was using the word "similar", to represent this is only for a rough concept
> level similarity, rather than detailed facts. But, seems it was not enough,
> sorry. Anyway, I will not talk more and thus disturb you having the important
> discussion with leaders here, as you are asking.

First of all, I want to apologize.

I detested what I read, and I still don't like "a rough concept level
similarity" sitting next to a factual statement. But as Borislav has
reminded me, my tone did cross the line. I should have had used an
objective approach to express my (very) different views.

I hope that's all water under the bridge now. And I do plan to carry
on with what I should have had done.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-05 22:07    [W:0.226 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site