Messages in this thread | | | From | Heiko Stübner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] RISC-V: KVM: Mark the existing SBI implementation as v01 | Date | Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:27:14 +0100 |
| |
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 14:19:41 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > Hi Atish, > > Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2021, 09:39:08 CET schrieb Atish Patra: > > From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > > > The existing SBI specification impelementation follows v0.1 > > specification. The latest specification allows more > > scalability and performance improvements. > > > > Rename the existing implementation as v01 and provide a way to allow > > future extensions. > > > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> > > --- > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > index eb3c045edf11..32376906ff20 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > -/** > > +/* > > * Copyright (c) 2019 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. > > * > > * Authors: > > This got already fixed by [0] > commit 0e2e64192100 ("riscv: kvm: fix non-kernel-doc comment block") > so this patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore.
hmm, just found Anup's "I've queued this..." message after writing my reply, so scratch the above ;-) .
@Anup: I've looked at git.kernel.org but didn't find a tree there, can you tell me where this did go to?
Thanks Heiko
| |