lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 10/23] ima: Move IMA securityfs files into ima_namespace or onto stack
From

On 1/26/22 04:40, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:46:32PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Only the securityfs IMA policy file is ever removed based on Kconfig
>> options. For this reason, move the IMA securityfs policy file variable
>> 'ima_policy' into the ima_namespace.
>>
>> Move the other IMA securityfs files onto the stack since they are not
>> needed outside the function where they are created in. Also, their cleanup
>> is automatically handled by the filesystem upon umount of a virtualized
>> securityfs instance, so they don't need to be explicitly freed.
> I'd reverse the explantion in the commit and mention the securityfs
> change that makes this move possible which is patch 3 in this version of
> the series ("securityfs: rework dentry creation"); something like:
>
> Earlier we simplified how dentry creation and deletion is manged in
> securityfs. This allows us to move IMA securityfs files from global
> variables directly into ima_fs_ns_init() itself. We can now rely on
> those dentries to be cleaned up when the securityfs instance is cleaned
> when the last reference to it is dropped.
>
> Things are slightly different for the initial ima namespace. In contrast
> to non-initial ima namespaces it has pinning logic binding the lifetime
> of the securityfs superblock to created dentries. We need to keep this
> behavior to not regress userspace. Since ima never removes most of the
> securityfs files the initial securityfs instance stays pinned. This also
> means even for the initial ima namespace we don't need to keep
> references to these dentries anywhere.
>
> The ima_policy file is the exception since ima can end up removing it if
> a non-default policy is written at some point.
>
> Last sentence should be checked for sensibility by ima folks.

I remove the if clause and took the other text as-is...

Thanks.

   Stefan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-27 18:03    [W:0.336 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site