lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: export supported_xcr0 via UAPI
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:22:07AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> While working on the QEMU support for AMX, I noticed that there is no
> equivalent of ARCH_GET_XCOMP_SUPP in the KVM API. This is important
> because KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID is meant to be passed (by simple-minded
> VMMs) to KVM_SET_CPUID2, and therefore it cannot include any dynamic
> xsave states that have not been enabled. Probing the availability of
> dynamic xsave states therefore, requires a new ioctl or arch_prctl.
>
> In order to avoid moving supported_xcr0 to the kernel from the KVM
> module just for this use, and to ensure that the value can only be
> probed if/after the KVM module has been loaded, this series goes
> for the former option.
>
> KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION cannot be used because it only has 32 bits of
> output; in order to limit the growth of capabilities and ioctls, the
> series adds a /dev/kvm variant of KVM_{GET,HAS}_DEVICE_ATTR that
> can be used in the future and by other architectures. It then
> implements it in x86 with just one group (0) and attribute
> (KVM_X86_XCOMP_GUEST_SUPP).
>
> The corresponding changes to the tests, in patches 1 and 3, are
> designed so that the code will be covered (to the possible extent)
> even when running the tests on systems that do not support AMX.
> However, the patches have not been tested with AMX.
>

Paolo, thanks for this patchset. I applied this patchset into latest
Linux release, and verified it from kvm selftest tool and Qemu side
(In order to verify this easily, I reused the older request permission
function like kvm selftest did), all work well. thanks!

Yang

> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
>
> Paolo Bonzini (3):
> selftests: kvm: move vm_xsave_req_perm call to amx_test
> KVM: x86: add system attribute to retrieve full set of supported xsave
> states
> selftests: kvm: check dynamic bits against KVM_X86_XCOMP_GUEST_SUPP
>
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 4 +-
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 1 -
> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 7 ---
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 27 ++++++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/amx_test.c | 2 +
> 11 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-27 06:55    [W:0.109 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site