lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: ignore flags if SS_DISABLE is set
Date
ss_flags combo of SS_AUTODISARM|SS_DISABLE can be used to check
the support of SS_AUTODISARM. We need to remove the like flags and
only keep SS_DISABLE because many libraries (eg asan runtime)
check if SAS is disabled by just checking "ss_flags == SS_DISABLE".

Also man page mandates that only 1 flag can be returned, so
returning SS_AUTODISARM|SS_DISABLE should be disallowed.

Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>
CC: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/signal.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 38602738866e..40634a500317 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -4209,6 +4209,7 @@ do_sigaltstack (const stack_t *ss, stack_t *oss, unsigned long sp,
if (ss_mode == SS_DISABLE) {
ss_size = 0;
ss_sp = NULL;
+ ss_flags = SS_DISABLE;
} else {
if (unlikely(ss_size < min_ss_size))
ret = -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-26 20:23    [W:0.084 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site