Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:16:43 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] docs: add a document about regression handling | From | Randy Dunlap <> |
| |
On 1/26/22 06:10, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> +The important bits for people affected by regressions >>> +===================================================== >>> + >>> +It's a regression if something running fine with one Linux kernel works worse or >>> +not at all with a newer version. Note, the newer kernel has to be compiled using >>> +a similar configuration -- for this and other fine print, check out below >>> +section "What is a 'regression' and what is the 'no regressions rule'?". >> Can we be consistent with either single or double quotes? I'd suggest >> "double quotes" but won't make a fuss about that. > Changed to "double quotes" everywhere in the text. But just to make sure > I get things right: in this particular case this will result in > > ...section "What is a "regression" and what is the "no regressions rule"?". > > This looks a bit strange to me. Something in me really would like to > quote the section's header in single quotes, but I guess grammar rules > do not allow that, so whatever. :-D >
I think that it was correct with the mixed quotes. Using all double quotes here is confusing.
-- ~Randy
| |