lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 6/6] RISC-V: Do not use cpumask data structure for hartid bitmap
Hi Atish,

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:21 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:26 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com> wrote:
> > On 20 Jan 2022, at 09:09, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> > > Currently, SBI APIs accept a hartmask that is generated from struct
> > > cpumask. Cpumask data structure can hold upto NR_CPUs value. Thus, it
> > > is not the correct data structure for hartids as it can be higher
> > > than NR_CPUs for platforms with sparse or discontguous hartids.
> > >
> > > Remove all association between hartid mask and struct cpumask.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For Linux RISC-V changes)
> > > Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For KVM RISC-V changes)
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>

> I am yet to reproduce it on my end.
> @Geert Uytterhoeven: can you please try the below diff on your end.

Unfortunately it doesn't fix the issue for me.

/me debugging...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-26 09:29    [W:0.053 / U:1.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site