Messages in this thread | | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:28:46 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] RISC-V: Do not use cpumask data structure for hartid bitmap |
| |
Hi Atish,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 3:21 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:26 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com> wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2022, at 09:09, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > > Currently, SBI APIs accept a hartmask that is generated from struct > > > cpumask. Cpumask data structure can hold upto NR_CPUs value. Thus, it > > > is not the correct data structure for hartids as it can be higher > > > than NR_CPUs for platforms with sparse or discontguous hartids. > > > > > > Remove all association between hartid mask and struct cpumask. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For Linux RISC-V changes) > > > Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For KVM RISC-V changes) > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> I am yet to reproduce it on my end. > @Geert Uytterhoeven: can you please try the below diff on your end.
Unfortunately it doesn't fix the issue for me.
/me debugging...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |