lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 4/9] rethook: x86: Add rethook x86 implementation
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 01:10:09 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Add rethook for x86 implementation. Most of the code
> has been copied from kretprobes on x86.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - fix stack backtrace as same as kretprobe does.
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1
> arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h | 4 +
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1
> arch/x86/kernel/rethook.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/rethook.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 5c2ccb85f2ef..0a7d48a63787 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ config X86
> select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> + select HAVE_RETHOOK
> select HAVE_KVM
> select HAVE_LIVEPATCH if X86_64
> select HAVE_MIXED_BREAKPOINTS_REGS
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
> index 2a1f8734416d..9fe5f73f22f1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/rethook.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>
> @@ -107,6 +108,9 @@ static inline
> unsigned long unwind_recover_kretprobe(struct unwind_state *state,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long *addr_p)
> {
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RETHOOK) && is_rethook_trampoline(addr))
> + return rethook_find_ret_addr(state->task, (unsigned long)addr_p,
> + &state->kr_cur);

Hm, I found that this doesn't work since state->kr_cur is not defined when
CONFIG_KRETPROBES=n. Even if I define it with CONFIG_RETHOOK=y, if both
CONFIG_RETHOOK and CONFIG_KRETPROBES are 'n', the compiler caused a build
error. So I decided to use #ifdef here in the next version.

Thank you,


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-25 08:16    [W:0.095 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site