lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.16 0728/1039] scripts: sphinx-pre-install: Fix ctex support on Debian
    On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:15:51AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
    > Em Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:48:39 +0900
    > Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> escreveu:
    >
    > > Hi Greg,
    > >
    > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:41:57 +0100,
    > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    > > > From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
    > > >
    > > > [ Upstream commit 87d6576ddf8ac25f36597bc93ca17f6628289c16 ]
    > > >
    > > > The name of the package with ctexhook.sty is different on
    > > > Debian/Ubuntu.
    > > >
    > > > Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
    > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
    > > > Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
    > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63882425609a2820fac78f5e94620abeb7ed5f6f.1641429634.git.mchehab@kernel.org
    > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
    > > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
    > >
    > > This "Fix" is against upstream commit 7baab965896e ("scripts:
    > > sphinx-pre-install: add required ctex dependency") which is
    > > also new to v5.17-rc1.
    > >
    > > So I don't think this is worth backporting to stable branches.
    >
    > Well, either both patches should be backported or none, IMHO.
    > I guess I would just backport also commit 7baab965896e.

    Ok, in looking at that report, it makes sense, I'll add both of these
    now.

    thanks,

    greg k-h

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2022-01-25 10:30    [W:4.054 / U:0.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site