lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf map: Fix namespace memory leak
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:01 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 8:48 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 03:10, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As with:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20220122045811.3402706-4-irogers@google.com/
> > > I implemented REFCNT_CHECKING for nsinfo (I'll mail it soon). This
> > > more accurately identifies the problem. In one run I got:
> > > ```
> > > =================================================================
> > > ==3900722==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: attempting double-free on
> > > 0x602000026710 in thread T6:
> > > #0 0x7f9a1dd6f4d7 in __interceptor_free
> > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:127
> > > #1 0x5650d04cb29c in nsinfo__put util/namespaces.c:259
> > > #2 0x5650d04aba93 in map__new util/map.c:198
> > > #3 0x5650d04a11f6 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1798
> > > #4 0x5650d04a24bf in machine__process_event util/machine.c:2019
> > > #5 0x5650d03e78b3 in perf_event__process util/event.c:567
> > > #6 0x5650d056e3bb in perf_tool__process_synth_event
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:65
> > > #7 0x5650d05711a6 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:501
> > > #8 0x5650d0572fc0 in __event__synthesize_thread util/synthetic-events.c:792
> > > #9 0x5650d05739fd in __perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:929
> > > #10 0x5650d0573cbd in synthesize_threads_worker util/synthetic-events.c:961
> > > #11 0x7f9a1dc48d7f in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:481
> > > #12 0x7f9a1cfdcb6e in clone (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0xfcb6e)
> > >
> > > 0x602000026710 is located 0 bytes inside of 8-byte region
> > > [0x602000026710,0x602000026718)
> > > freed by thread T13 here:
> > > #0 0x7f9a1dd6f4d7 in __interceptor_free
> > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:127
> > > #1 0x5650d04cb29c in nsinfo__put util/namespaces.c:259
> > > #2 0x5650d04aba93 in map__new util/map.c:198
> > > #3 0x5650d04a11f6 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1798
> > > #4 0x5650d04a24bf in machine__process_event util/machine.c:2019
> > > #5 0x5650d03e78b3 in perf_event__process util/event.c:567
> > > #6 0x5650d056e3bb in perf_tool__process_synth_event
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:65
> > > #7 0x5650d05711a6 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:501
> > > #8 0x5650d0572fc0 in __event__synthesize_thread util/synthetic-events.c:792
> > > #9 0x5650d05739fd in __perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:929
> > > #10 0x5650d0573cbd in synthesize_threads_worker util/synthetic-events.c:961
> > > #11 0x7f9a1dc48d7f in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:481
> > >
> > > previously allocated by thread T3 here:
> > > #0 0x7f9a1dd6f7cf in __interceptor_malloc
> > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
> > > #1 0x5650d04cb17f in nsinfo__get util/namespaces.c:244
> > > #2 0x5650d04ab7df in map__new util/map.c:150
> > > #3 0x5650d04a11f6 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1798
> > > #4 0x5650d04a24bf in machine__process_event util/machine.c:2019
> > > #5 0x5650d03e78b3 in perf_event__process util/event.c:567
> > > #6 0x5650d056e3bb in perf_tool__process_synth_event
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:65
> > > #7 0x5650d05711a6 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:501
> > > #8 0x5650d0572fc0 in __event__synthesize_thread util/synthetic-events.c:792
> > > #9 0x5650d05739fd in __perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:929
> > > #10 0x5650d0573cbd in synthesize_threads_worker util/synthetic-events.c:961
> > > #11 0x7f9a1dc48d7f in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:481
> > >
> > > Thread T6 created by T0 here:
> > > #0 0x7f9a1dd17716 in __interceptor_pthread_create
> > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:216
> > > #1 0x5650d05745eb in perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:1039
> > > #2 0x5650d05789fc in __machine__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:1791
> > > #3 0x5650d0578a81 in machine__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:1802
> > > #4 0x5650d024edd8 in __cmd_top
> > > /usr/local/google/home/irogers/kernel-trees/kernel.org/tip/tools/perf/builtin-top.c:1273
> > > #5 0x5650d025629b in cmd_top
> > > /usr/local/google/home/irogers/kernel-trees/kernel.org/tip/tools/perf/builtin-top.c:1774
> > > #6 0x5650d03b132b in run_builtin
> > > /usr/local/google/home/irogers/kernel-trees/kernel.org/tip/tools/perf/perf.c:313
> > > #7 0x5650d03b188d in handle_internal_command
> > > /usr/local/google/home/irogers/kernel-trees/kernel.org/tip/tools/perf/perf.c:365
> > > #8 0x5650d03b1c52 in run_argv
> > > /usr/local/google/home/irogers/kernel-trees/kernel.org/tip/tools/perf/perf.c:409
> > > #9 0x5650d03b246b in main
> > > /usr/local/google/home/irogers/kernel-trees/kernel.org/tip/tools/perf/perf.c:539
> > > #10 0x7f9a1cf077ec in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:332
> > >
> > > Thread T13 created by T0 here:
> > > #0 0x7f9a1dd17716 in __interceptor_pthread_create
> > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:216
> > > #1 0x5650d05745eb in perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:1039
> > > #2 0x5650d05789fc in __machine__synthesize_threads
> > > util/synthetic-events.c:1791
> > > ```
> > > That is thread 3 had created the wrapper object around the nsinfo,
> > > thread 13 had put and freed it which cause a double free when thread 6
> > > tried to do the same thing. How did thread 6 and 13 have the same
> > > value for dso->nsinfo? In this patch we read then put the value, as
> > > the put is slow another thread reads and puts the value too. We need
> > > to atomically swap the value of dso->nsinfo with nsi and then do a put
> > > on nsi which holds the old value of dso->nsinfo. The question is how
> > > to do the swap?
> > >
> > > C11 has atomic_exchange, but Makefile.config sets the std as gnu99.
> > > C11 is used in some selftests. atomic_t and atomic_long_t aren't
> > > guaranteed to be 64-bit, a long can be 32-bit with 64-bit pointers.
> > > Using a non-atomic swap fixes the issue, memory leak, etc. but clearly
> > > this needs to be atomic. My preference would be to bump to C11, but I
> > > can do a linux atomic or poor man's swap if others prefer. Wdyt?
> >
> > I don't know if perf uses this already or not, but fwiw compilers
> > support atomic ops as builtins as well. This works with any C/C++
> > standard versions:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html
>
> Thanks Dmitry,
>
> the tools/perf code tries to follow kernel conventions as much as
> possible. The current atomic code on x86 will use:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h?h=perf/core
> I could imagine some push back on using C11, it seems unfortunate to
> reinvent stdatomic.h with compiler builtins, there is likely a reason
> the kernel prefers asm for atomics over compiler intrinsics. Fwiw, I
> think the build of perf I normally make uses GNU C17 as its standard.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian

Fwiw, I extended the use of the dso lock and sidestepped the atomics
question. v2 patch-set fixing this problem up:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20220125204602.4137477-1-irogers@google.com/

Thanks,
Ian

> > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 9:20 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:00 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > > <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Em Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 04:40:26PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:37:14AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > > > This leak was happening reliably with test "Lookup mmap thread" with
> > > > > > > stack traces like:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Direct leak of 5504 byte(s) in 172 object(s) allocated from:
> > > > > > > #0 0x7f4685e47987 in __interceptor_calloc
> > > > > > > #1 0x56063b974c2a in nsinfo__new util/namespaces.c:142
> > > > > > > #2 0x56063b9781ff in thread__new util/thread.c:70
> > > > > > > #3 0x56063b944953 in ____machine__findnew_thread util/machine.c:543
> > > > > > > #4 0x56063b944ac6 in __machine__findnew_thread util/machine.c:574
> > > > > > > #5 0x56063b944b36 in machine__findnew_thread util/machine.c:584
> > > > > > > #6 0x56063b94c892 in machine__process_fork_event util/machine.c:1954
> > > > > > > #7 0x56063b94cc1f in machine__process_event util/machine.c:2019
> > > > > > > #8 0x56063b894f18 in perf_event__process util/event.c:567
> > > > > > > #9 0x56063ba17951 in perf_tool__process_synth_event util/synthetic-events.c:65
> > > > > > > #10 0x56063ba19086 in perf_event__synthesize_fork util/synthetic-events.c:287
> > > > > > > #11 0x56063ba1c39d in __event__synthesize_thread util/synthetic-events.c:775
> > > > > > > #12 0x56063ba1cf6f in __perf_event__synthesize_threads util/synthetic-events.c:929
> > > > > > > #13 0x56063ba1d4ab in perf_event__synthesize_threads util/synthetic-events.c:1000
> > > > > > > #14 0x56063b821a3d in synth_all tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c:136
> > > > > > > #15 0x56063b821c86 in mmap_events tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c:174
> > > > > > > #16 0x56063b8221b7 in test__mmap_thread_lookup tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c:230
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The dso->nsinfo is overwritten, but without a nsinfo__put this can leak
> > > > > > > the overwritten nsinfo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > nice catch!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This one is tricky, I have to retrieve the details from last time this
> > > > > surfaced, but try:
> > > > >
> > > > > # perf top -F 10000
> > > > >
> > > > > leave it for a while and press 'q':
> > > > >
> > > > > perf: /home/acme/git/perf/tools/include/linux/refcount.h:131: refcount_sub_and_test: Assertion `!(new > val)' failed.
> > > > > Aborted (core dumped)
> > > > >
> > > > > I reproduced the above assertion a few times, now I'm not being able,
> > > > > probably some namespace related activity took place when it hit.
> > > >
> > > > I was able to reproduce in about 1 run in 3. With address sanitizer
> > > > the core dump turns into a heap-use-after-free with a report of:
> > > >
> > > > ==235440==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address
> > > > 0x6030000485c8 at pc 0x55d8b882bfb7 bp 0x7fffd3426e90 sp
> > > > 0x7fffd3426e88
> > > > READ of size 4 at 0x6030000485c8 thread T0
> > > > #0 0x55d8b882bfb6 in __read_once_size ./tools/include/linux/compiler.h:132
> > > > #1 0x55d8b882bfb6 in atomic_read
> > > > ./tools/include/asm/../../arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28
> > > > #2 0x55d8b882c35c in refcount_sub_and_test
> > > > ./tools/include/linux/refcount.h:123
> > > > #3 0x55d8b882c45e in refcount_dec_and_test
> > > > ./tools/include/linux/refcount.h:148
> > > > #4 0x55d8b882d4af in nsinfo__put util/namespaces.c:204
> > > > #5 0x55d8b87adecd in __nsinfo__zput util/namespaces.h:65
> > > > #6 0x55d8b87b4bcc in dso__delete util/dso.c:1327
> > > > #7 0x55d8b87b4c8d in dso__put util/dso.c:1342
> > > > #8 0x55d8b87fb23b in dsos__purge util/machine.c:182
> > > > #9 0x55d8b87fb2e3 in dsos__exit util/machine.c:190
> > > > #10 0x55d8b87fb46e in machine__exit util/machine.c:222
> > > > #11 0x55d8b87fb715 in machines__exit util/machine.c:262
> > > > #12 0x55d8b88149d2 in perf_session__delete util/session.c:305
> > > > #13 0x55d8b85c0924 in cmd_top ./tools/perf/builtin-top.c:1781
> > > > #14 0x55d8b87176b7 in run_builtin ./tools/perf/perf.c:313
> > > > #15 0x55d8b8717c10 in handle_internal_command ./tools/perf/perf.c:365
> > > > #16 0x55d8b8717fcd in run_argv ./tools/perf/perf.c:409
> > > > #17 0x55d8b87187bc in main ./tools/perf/perf.c:539
> > > >
> > > > 0x6030000485c8 is located 24 bytes inside of 32-byte region
> > > > [0x6030000485b0,0x6030000485d0)
> > > > freed by thread T0 here:
> > > > #0 0x7fb6e7c454d7 in __interceptor_free
> > > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:127
> > > > #1 0x55d8b882d41a in nsinfo__delete util/namespaces.c:192
> > > > #2 0x55d8b882d4bf in nsinfo__put util/namespaces.c:205
> > > > #3 0x55d8b87adecd in __nsinfo__zput util/namespaces.h:65
> > > > #4 0x55d8b87b4bcc in dso__delete util/dso.c:1327
> > > > #5 0x55d8b87b4c8d in dso__put util/dso.c:1342
> > > > #6 0x55d8b87fb23b in dsos__purge util/machine.c:182
> > > > #7 0x55d8b87fb2e3 in dsos__exit util/machine.c:190
> > > > #8 0x55d8b87fb46e in machine__exit util/machine.c:222
> > > > #9 0x55d8b87fb715 in machines__exit util/machine.c:262
> > > > #10 0x55d8b88149d2 in perf_session__delete util/session.c:305
> > > > #11 0x55d8b85c0924 in cmd_top ./tools/perf/builtin-top.c:1781
> > > > #12 0x55d8b87176b7 in run_builtin ./tools/perf/perf.c:313
> > > > #13 0x55d8b8717c10 in handle_internal_command ./tools/perf/perf.c:365
> > > > #14 0x55d8b8717fcd in run_argv ./tools/perf/perf.c:409
> > > > #15 0x55d8b87187bc in main ./tools/perf/perf.c:539
> > > >
> > > > previously allocated by thread T11 here:
> > > > #0 0x7fb6e7c45987 in __interceptor_calloc
> > > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
> > > > #1 0x55d8b882ceaa in nsinfo__new util/namespaces.c:142
> > > > #2 0x55d8b883047f in thread__new util/thread.c:70
> > > > #3 0x55d8b87fcb93 in ____machine__findnew_thread util/machine.c:543
> > > > #4 0x55d8b87fcd06 in __machine__findnew_thread util/machine.c:574
> > > > #5 0x55d8b87fcd76 in machine__findnew_thread util/machine.c:584
> > > > #6 0x55d8b8804ad2 in machine__process_fork_event util/machine.c:1954
> > > > #7 0x55d8b8804e5f in machine__process_event util/machine.c:2019
> > > > #8 0x55d8b874cf18 in perf_event__process util/event.c:567
> > > > #9 0x55d8b88cfbd1 in perf_tool__process_synth_event
> > > > util/synthetic-events.c:65
> > > > #10 0x55d8b88d1306 in perf_event__synthesize_fork
> > > > util/synthetic-events.c:287
> > > > #11 0x55d8b88d461d in __event__synthesize_thread util/synthetic-events.c:775
> > > > #12 0x55d8b88d51ef in __perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > > util/synthetic-events.c:929
> > > > #13 0x55d8b88d54af in synthesize_threads_worker util/synthetic-events.c:961
> > > > #14 0x7fb6e7b1eead in start_thread nptl/pthread_create.c:463
> > > >
> > > > Thread T11 created by T0 here:
> > > > #0 0x7fb6e7bed716 in __interceptor_pthread_create
> > > > ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:216
> > > > #1 0x55d8b88d5ddd in perf_event__synthesize_threads
> > > > util/synthetic-events.c:1039
> > > > #2 0x55d8b88da3b8 in __machine__synthesize_threads
> > > > util/synthetic-events.c:1791
> > > > #3 0x55d8b88da43d in machine__synthesize_threads
> > > > util/synthetic-events.c:1802
> > > > #4 0x55d8b85b9378 in __cmd_top ./tools/perf/builtin-top.c:1273
> > > > #5 0x55d8b85c0811 in cmd_top ./tools/perf/builtin-top.c:1774
> > > > #6 0x55d8b87176b7 in run_builtin ./tools/perf/perf.c:313
> > > > #7 0x55d8b8717c10 in handle_internal_command ./tools/perf/perf.c:365
> > > > #8 0x55d8b8717fcd in run_argv ./tools/perf/perf.c:409
> > > > #9 0x55d8b87187bc in main ./tools/perf/perf.c:539
> > > >
> > > > SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free
> > > > ./tools/include/linux/compiler.h:132 in __read_once_size
> > > > Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
> > > > 0x0c0680001060: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa
> > > > 0x0c0680001070: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fa fa
> > > > 0x0c0680001080: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
> > > > 0x0c0680001090: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
> > > > 0x0c06800010a0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
> > > > =>0x0c06800010b0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd[fd]fa fa fa fa fa fa
> > > > 0x0c06800010c0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fa fa fa fd fd
> > > > 0x0c06800010d0: fd fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fa fa fd fd fd fa fa fa
> > > > 0x0c06800010e0: fd fd fd fd fa fa fd fd fd fd fa fa fd fd fd fa
> > > > 0x0c06800010f0: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fd fd
> > > > 0x0c0680001100: fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
> > > > Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
> > > > Addressable: 00
> > > > Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
> > > > Heap left redzone: fa
> > > > Freed heap region: fd
> > > > Stack left redzone: f1
> > > > Stack mid redzone: f2
> > > > Stack right redzone: f3
> > > > Stack after return: f5
> > > > Stack use after scope: f8
> > > > Global redzone: f9
> > > > Global init order: f6
> > > > Poisoned by user: f7
> > > > Container overflow: fc
> > > > Array cookie: ac
> > > > Intra object redzone: bb
> > > > ASan internal: fe
> > > > Left alloca redzone: ca
> > > > Right alloca redzone: cb
> > > > Shadow gap: cc
> > > > ==235440==ABORTING
> > > >
> > > > My hope was to land this so that 'perf test' wouldn't have new
> > > > failures caused by leak sanitizer. So one option could be to guard the
> > > > change with an address sanitizer #ifdef. The larger fix is to rework
> > > > the reference counting logic, but I'd really hope we could switch that
> > > > work to being in a language like Rust to get us out of the current
> > > > memory leak vs crash wac-a-mole.
> > > >
> > > > +Riccardo as he did some great and related fixes over the summer.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > - Arnaldo
> > > > >
> > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > > jirka
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > tools/perf/util/map.c | 1 +
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.c b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> > > > > > > index 8af693d9678c..ceed8f407bc0 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/map.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/map.c
> > > > > > > @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct map *map__new(struct machine *machine, u64 start, u64 len,
> > > > > > > if (!(prot & PROT_EXEC))
> > > > > > > dso__set_loaded(dso);
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > + nsinfo__put(dso->nsinfo);
> > > > > > > dso->nsinfo = nsi;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if (build_id__is_defined(bid))
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > 2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > - Arnaldo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-25 21:50    [W:0.064 / U:0.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site