Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Jan 2022 12:30:15 +0100 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] quota: cleanup double word in comment |
| |
On Sun 16-01-22 04:59:36, trix@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > Remove the second 'handle'. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Thanks. Applied to my tree.
Honza
> --- > include/linux/quota.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/quota.h b/include/linux/quota.h > index 18ebd39c94871..fd692b4a41d5f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/quota.h > +++ b/include/linux/quota.h > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ extern bool qid_valid(struct kqid qid); > * > * When there is no mapping defined for the user-namespace, type, > * qid tuple an invalid kqid is returned. Callers are expected to > - * test for and handle handle invalid kqids being returned. > + * test for and handle invalid kqids being returned. > * Invalid kqids may be tested for using qid_valid(). > */ > static inline struct kqid make_kqid(struct user_namespace *from, > -- > 2.26.3 > -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR
| |