Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:40:48 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 19/01/2022 02:50, Rob Herring wrote: > The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usually describes it. > > The array of phandles case boils down to needing: > > items: > maxItems: 1 > > The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form: > > items: > - items: > - description: A phandle > - description: 1st arg cell > - description: 2nd arg cell > > With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of > property values matches the schema. >
Samsung and memory controller bits look good:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |