lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/4] Watchdog: sp5100_tco: Replace cd6h/cd7h port I/O accesses with MMIO accesses
From
Date


On 1/19/22 12:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/19/22 9:47 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>
>>> I considered sending the request_muxed_mem_region() patch series first but
>>> was concerned the patch might not be accepted without a need or usage. I
>>> didn't see an obvious path forward for the order of submissions because of
>>> the dependencies.
>>
>> My suggestion: make the request_muxed_mem_region() patch the new patch 1
>> of the piix4 series. Then, the user will directly come in the following
>> patches. From this series, I will create an immutable branch which can
>> be pulled in by the watchdog tree. It will then have the dependency for
>> your watchdog series. During next merge window, we (the maintainers)
>> will make sure that I2C will hit Linus' tree before the watchdog tree.
>>
>> This works the other way around as well, if needed. Make
>> request_muxed_mem_region() the first patch of the watchdog series and
>> let me pull an immutable branch from watchdog into I2C.
>>
>
> Creating an immutable branch from i2c is fine. Also, typically Wim sends
> his pull request late in the commit window, so i2c first should be no
> problem either.
>
> Also, if the immutable branch only includes the patch introducing
> request_muxed_mem_region(), the pull order should not really matter.
>
> Guenter

Ok, I'll add the request_muxed_mem_region() patch to the i2c v3 series
as the first patch.

Reqards,
Terry

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-19 19:46    [W:0.079 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site