Messages in this thread | | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:42:53 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Improve phandle-array schemas |
| |
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:50 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> The 'phandle-array' type is a bit ambiguous. It can be either just an > array of phandles or an array of phandles plus args. Many schemas for > phandle-array properties aren't clear in the schema which case applies > though the description usually describes it. > > The array of phandles case boils down to needing: > > items: > maxItems: 1 > > The phandle plus args cases should typically take this form: > > items: > - items: > - description: A phandle > - description: 1st arg cell > - description: 2nd arg cell > > With this change, some examples need updating so that the bracketing of > property values matches the schema.
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
The Renesas parts look good to me. Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |