lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 29/40] x86/compressed/64: add support for SEV-SNP CPUID table in #VC handlers
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 08:32:38AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 08:23:45AM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 03:02:48PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:35:21PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately, in sev_enable(), between the point where snp_init() is
> > > > called, and sev_status is actually set, there are a number of cpuid
> > > > intructions which will make use of do_vc_no_ghcb() prior to sev_status
> > > > being set (and it needs to happen in that order to set sev_status
> > > > appropriately). After that point, snp_cpuid_active() would no longer be
> > > > necessary, but during that span some indicator is needed in case this
> > > > is just an SEV-ES guest trigger cpuid #VCs.
> > >
> > > You mean testing what snp_cpuid_info_create() set up is not enough?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> > > index 7bc7e297f88c..17cfe804bad3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> > > @@ -523,7 +523,9 @@ static int snp_cpuid_postprocess(u32 func, u32 subfunc, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
> > > static int snp_cpuid(u32 func, u32 subfunc, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx,
> > > u32 *edx)
> > > {
> > > - if (!snp_cpuid_active())
> > > + const struct snp_cpuid_info *c = snp_cpuid_info_get_ptr();
> > > +
> > > + if (!c->count)
> > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > >
> > > if (!snp_cpuid_find_validated_func(func, subfunc, eax, ebx, ecx, edx)) {
> >
> > snp_cpuid_info_get_ptr() will always return non-NULL, since it's a
> > pointer to the local copy of the cpuid page. But I can probably re-work
>
> Doh, misread your patch. Yes I think checking the count would also work,
> since a valid table should be non-zero.

Actually, no, because doing that would provide hypervisor a means to
effectively disable CPUID page for an SNP guest by provided a table with
count == 0, which needs to be guarded against.

But can still implement something similar by having snp_cpuid_info_get_ptr()
return NULL if local copy of cpuid page hasn't been initialized.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-18 15:38    [W:0.131 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site