Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Date | Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:14:10 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 13/23] dt-bindings: arm: add Tesla FSD ARM SoC |
| |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 2:26 PM Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> wrote: > > >I cannot judge how different this is from Exynos subarchitecture - looking at > >patches it is not different - so I could understand a FSD sub-arch with only one > >SoC. > > > I understand, it is a bit difficult to visualize it with the current patch set. > As discuss on the other thread, FSD is different, more over the vendor is different, internal design is different.
Is it based on another SoC design then? Most new SoCs are derived from some other one, so it makes sense to put it into the same family. E.g. the Apple M1 takes bits from both Exynos and PA-Semi SoCs but has more newly added components than either one.
I would argue that if this SoC shares the pinctrl, clock, spi, adc, and timer implementation with Exynos, we should consider it part of the Exynos family, regardless of what other blocks may exist next to those.
Arnd
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |