Messages in this thread | | | From | Dave Hansen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/sgx: account backing pages | Date | Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:55:43 -0800 |
| |
On 1/14/22 3:52 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> I can understand your hesitation, but I agree with Dave here that >> wrapping the function makes the code more clear. I would prefer to keep >> this the way it is. > What if sgx_encl_get_backing() was changed as "static inline", if the > only motivation is encapsulation?
What would the purpose be of adding an 'inline' to the function definition?
| |