Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:47:37 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH][RESEND] sata_fsl: Use struct_group() for memcpy() region | From | Damien Le Moal <> |
| |
On 1/13/22 08:15, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 03:23:40PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 1/12/22 3:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time >>> field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid >>> intentionally writing across neighboring fields. >>> >>> Use struct_group() in struct command_desc around members acmd and fill, >>> so they can be referenced together. This will allow memset(), memcpy(), >>> and sizeof() to more easily reason about sizes, improve readability, >>> and avoid future warnings about writing beyond the end of acmd: >>> >>> In function 'fortify_memset_chk', >>> inlined from 'sata_fsl_qc_prep' at drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c:534:3: >>> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:199:4: warning: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] >>> 199 | __write_overflow_field(); >>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> >>> Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> Jens, can you take (or Ack) this? It's a dependency for the FORTIFY_SOURCE >>> improvements that are close to being finished. :) >> >> I don't maintain libata anymore, so Damien is the guy to nudge ;-) > > Ah-ha, okay, thanks. > > /me waves "hi" to Damien. :)
Hi Kees,
This is already queued up in libata tree for-5.17 branch. I have not sent my PR to Linus yet as I am letting things soack a little longer in for-next (for the various arch compile tests).
Please check that branch to see if all is OK !
Cheers.
-- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
| |