Messages in this thread | | | From | Hsin-Yi Wang <> | Date | Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:24:48 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter" |
| |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:58 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org> wrote: > > hi Konstantin and Tareque, > > Can you help provide logs if we apply > 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd but revert > 8d35a2596164c1c9d34d4656fd42b445cd1e247f? > Another thing might be helpful to test with:
after apply 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd 1. delete SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend_late, i2c_resume_early) and function i2c_suspend_late() and i2c_resume_early(). 2. delete SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume, NULL) and function i2c_runtime_suspend() and i2c_runtime_resume().
Does it still fail if we do 1 or 2?
Sorry that we don't have a platform with intel CPU and amd GPU combination to test with.
> Thanks > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:02 PM Tareque Md Hanif > <tarequemd.hanif@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 1/12/22 15:51, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > would the reporters of the > > > regression be available for further testing? > > Sure. I am available.
| |