Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jiasheng Jiang <> | Subject | [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Check for error num after setting mask | Date | Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:31:56 +0800 |
| |
Because of the possible failure of the dma_supported(), the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() may return error num. Therefore, it should be better to check it and return the error if fails. And since the sdhci_setup_host() has already checked the return value of the enable_dma, we need not check it in sdhci_resume_host() again.
Fixes: 5552d7ad596c ("mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set proper dma mask for ls104x chips") Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> --- Changelog
v1 -> v2
* Change 1. Remove the change of esdhc_of_resume and refine the commit * message. --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c index a593b1fbd69e..0f3658b36513 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c @@ -524,12 +524,16 @@ static void esdhc_of_adma_workaround(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask) static int esdhc_of_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host) { + int ret; u32 value; struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc); if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc") || - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) - dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) { + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); + if (ret) + return ret; + } value = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL); -- 2.25.1
| |