lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2022]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] mm/pgtable: define pte_index so that preprocessor could recognize it
Date
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

Since commit 974b9b2c68f3 ("mm: consolidate pte_index() and pte_offset_*()
definitions") pte_index is a static inline and there is no define for it
that can be recognized by the preprocessor. As the result,
vm_insert_pages() uses slower loop over vm_insert_page() instead of
insert_pages() that amortizes the cost of spinlock operations when
inserting multiple pages.

Fixes: 974b9b2c68f3 ("mm: consolidate pte_index() and pte_offset_*() definitions")
Reported-by: Christian Dietrich <stettberger@dokucode.de>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
include/linux/pgtable.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
index e24d2c992b11..d468efcf48f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pte_index(unsigned long address)
{
return (address >> PAGE_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PTE - 1);
}
+#define pte_index pte_index

#ifndef pmd_index
static inline unsigned long pmd_index(unsigned long address)
base-commit: 2585cf9dfaaddf00b069673f27bb3f8530e2039c
--
2.28.0

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2022-01-11 15:56    [W:0.039 / U:0.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site